Showing posts with label Connecticut. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Connecticut. Show all posts

Monday, March 2, 2026

Connecticut residents protest the US war on Iran

By Reginald Johnson


Recent days have seen protests pop up around Connecticut against the illegal attack by the United States and Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
In Norwalk on Saturday, about 20 people attended a vigil against the war and an anti-war banner was hung over the I-95 bridge at Exit 16.
"We tried to stop this war. We we were unsuccessful. So now we're trying to stop this one as soon as we can," said John Miksad, one of the participants, in an interview with News 12.
Benjamin Wesley, who helped organize the vigil, said "Nobody wants this war but we have to be LOUD with our lawmakers and make it clear to them! The lives of our fellow American servicemen and citizens and Iranian servicemen and civilians hang in the balance."
Wesley said a big focus going forward should be on getting Congress to pass war powers resolutions which will require President Trump to obtain Congressional authorization before launching any further attacks on Iran.
Groups participating in the Norwalk protest were Veterans for Peace, Jewish Voice for Peace, World Beyond War. The Peace Pact and Democratic Socialists of Connecticut.
In New Haven, about 60 people rallied against the war on Sunday outside City Hall.
The ANSWER Coalition and the Party for Socialism and Liberation sponsored the demonstration, according to the New Haven Independent.

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Memories of Jesse Jackson

  By Reginald Johnson 



              Sad to see Jesse Jackson leave the stage. He was a great man who constantly worked for a fairer, more progressive society. He moved the needle.

              I was fortunate enough to see Jackson twice in person. The first time was in the spring of 1984, when he was campaigning for president. He came to a rally at the low-income project, Beardsley Terrace, now known as Trumbull Gardens, in Bridgeport. There was a huge crowd that had gathered to hear him. He urged the many young people in attendance to keep working for their education, never lose hope and always believe in themselves.

      Then he led the crowd in a chant: "I Am --- Somebody!"  "I Am Somebody!" "I Am --- Somebody!"

      It was electrifying.

     Years went by, and it was 1991--- after the Democrats had foolishly turned him away from gaining the nomination to run for president --- and Jackson was still on the move.  Now he had started a new campaign called a "March to Rebuild America" and he came to Connecticut, home of some very poor cities like Bridgeport and other communities of great affluence. Jackson spoke out against the wealth disparites and said it was not sustainable.

  The march wound through a number of towns and cities, including Bridgeport and Hartford. Before coming to Bridgeport, he stopped for a rally in Milford, an event organized by my good friend Glenn Davis. Although the mostly white town of Milford had been accused by some of being less than friendly to minorities, Jackson got a very warm reception. People were lined up all along Route 1 as the march wound its way to Stratford.

  I was standing on the edge of the Devon Bridge and I'll never forget seeing Jackson walking towards the bridge with the other marchers, while people along the route clapped and cheered.

  Later Jackson walked through the heart of Bridgeport --- a once powerful industrial city that had fallen into bankruptcy. He marched up East Main Street, and somewhere I have a great photo taken by the Post of Jackson walking alongside the longtime activist and Puerto Rican community leader, Willie Matos.

  No doubt, Jesse Jackson was a wonderful person who made a difference. We need more people like him.

   May he rest in peace.

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

Veterans walk for peace

 

 By Reginald Johnson

 


 One time they marched to war.

Now they’re walking for peace.

Members of the national group Veterans for Peace are walking 700 miles from Maine to Washington, DC to highlight the need to end wars and militarism.

They’re also pressing for action on the existential threat of climate change.

The long walk is entitled “Peace Walk 2024 --- Silencing the Drums of War.”

“What these veterans want is independence from the dark prison of war and militarism so that our nation can focus its attention, energy, resources, and creativity on addressing the real threats of nuclear war, climate collapse and future pandemics,” said a release from Veterans for Peace.

  “They believe that our focus on military and economic primacy in the world is misguided because the only way to address these global threats is collaboratively through global cooperation,” the statement read.

The walkers started out from Ogunquit, Maine on May 7 and are now in Connecticut. They marched through eastern Connecticut towns along the shoreline last week, were in Norwalk for the Memorial Day Parade on Monday, will be in Milford Wednesday and in Bridgeport on Thursday.

 The walk will end on July 5 in the nation’s capital, where participants will take part in demonstrations against NATO at that organizations 75th anniversary celebration.

  VFP leaders said anyone can take part in the event and walk any distance they can along the designated route. To register to walk, volunteer or donate, go to this website: http://peacewalk2024.org/get-involved/

 Jim Brasile, a Vietnam War veteran from Newington who walked a number of miles in eastern Connecticut, said marchers carry a variety of anti-war signs, like “Stop War” and “Stop the Killing in Gaza” and “Nuclear Weapons are Illegal."  

 People are walking on either the sidewalks or in the bike lanes.

Brasile said while most drivers ignore the walkers, others honk or give them the thumbs up.

 “With about 70%, there is no response. They’re busy. About 20%, we get thumbs up or the peace sign. And then with 10 percent maybe, you get half the peace sign turned around and a lot of them shaking their heads. They can’t mentally understand what we’re trying to say.”

  But Brasile is happy with the people that are responding positively. “Every little bit helps.” he said.

     

Members of Veterans for Peace are taking part in a 700-mile walk from Maine to Washington, DC to protest war. Here some of the walkers stop in New London, Connecticut, holding anti-war signs outside the Electric Boat company, which makes submarines for the Navy.

  John Miksad, a Veterans for Peace member from Wilton said a group of about 30-40 people joined together to take part in the Norwalk Memorial Day Parade where they carried peace banners and got a good reception from the crowd.

  The peace group had veterans (including a 92-year-old Korean War vet), members of St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in Norwalk, Quakers and others.

 “I’ve been marching in the parade for about five years and this is the best turnout we’ve had,” said Miksad.

   “This is a good sign because it appears the peace movement is growing again. My guess is what’s happening is, particularly young people, are seeing this war in Gaza, the horror of civilians being killed, 14,000 children killed, people buried in the rubble and I think they’re seeing firsthand the violence and the barbarity of war.”

 He added, “People are repulsed by it. It’s being live streamed onto people’s phones and tablets and computers and they’re saying, ‘Not in my name.’ Certainly that’s what these veterans who are are walking are saying, ‘Not in our name.’ “

  The peace walk is dedicated to Daniel Ellsberg, the long-time anti-war activist who died last year.  In 1971, Ellsberg released the trove of classified documents known as "The Pentagon Papers" which revealed the lies the government had told about the Vietnam War.  The revelations helped swing public opinion against the war and led to an end to the conflict.

 

 

    

 

 

 

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Jewish leaders ask City Council to rescind Gaza ceasefire resolution

     

       BRIDGEPORT REPORT

 

     By Reginald Johnson

 

   BRIDGEPORT --- Reversing a previous stand, leaders of Bridgeport’s Jewish community have come out against the City Council’s recently passed Gaza cease-fire resolution and are demanding that the resolution be rescinded.

 On January 2 when the resolution calling on Congress to work for a cease-fire in Palestine was passed by the council, Jewish leaders present at that time indicated that they were satisfied with the statement, after language criticizing Israel was removed.

 However, a coalition of Jewish groups and synagogues that came together after that have now issued a statement saying that the City Council had no place taking up an international issue and have asked Mayor Joseph Ganim and the City Council to withdraw the resolution.

 Some leaders are claiming that the resolution is fueling anti-Semitism.

“The resolution you passed has divided our community and promoted anti-Semitic vitriol,” said Carin Sevel, CEO of the Jewish Federation of Greater Fairfield County, speaking at the City Council’s public forum Monday night, “Hate crimes against Jews are up 400% since October 7… There is too much hate and division in our community and I think you can do better,” she said.

  Deborah Boles president of the Congregation Rodeph Sholom on Park Avenue, said “We learned about the resolution 2023 (ceasefire resolution) the day it was reported on the front page of the Connecticut Post and read that there was Jewish input. We knew nothing about it.”

  Boles maintained that the council appears to been “misled” by the group Jewish Voice for Peace. She said that her research showed that Jewish Voice for Peace is “anti-Israel” and “don’t represent the mainstream Jewish community.”


Pro-Israel supporters attended the City Council meeting to oppose the ceasefire resolution. (Reginald Johnson photo)


  A number of opponents of the resolution showed up at the City Council on Monday to voice their disapproval and wave pro-Israel placards and signs.

  However, a much larger crowd of resolution supporters were on hand, many of them wearing the traditional Palestinian keffiyeh and waving Palestinian flags. A number of speakers from this group stepped forward to thank the city’s legislative body for passing the resolution and urge that the council hold firm in keeping the ceasefire statement in place.

 The Rev. Anthony Bennett, pastor of the Mount Aery Baptist Church in Bridgeport, was one of those.

  “I’m encouraging you to stand your ground in keeping this resolution which calls for an immediate cease-fire, humanitarian aid, and a return of all hostages in exchange for the previously negotiated release of Palestinian political prisoners,” he said.

   The president of the Bridgeport Islamic Community Center, Dr. Khaled Elleithy, said he was proud of the City Council for adopting the cease-fire resolution, making Bridgeport the first city in Connecticut to do so.

  “With the understanding that the City Council has no power to enforce such a resolution or investigate any claims of wrongdoing,  it remains a historic statement by the City Council. It is a call for peace. Just a call for peace. Nevertheless, some cannot digest a call for peace,” he said.

                                      

Palestinian supporters tell the City Council to stand firm against attacks on the Gaza ceasefire resolution. (Reginald Johnson photo) 

  There was no indication Monday that there is any serious move afoot on the council to rescind the resolution. The original vote on the statement was a decisive 13 to 2 in favor. Council Members who voted for the resolution said that while it is true that the city does not typically take up international matters, occasionally there are issues that are so important on a moral level that a statement by the council is in order.

Council Member Maria Pereira, a vociferous critic of the resolution, maintained the body had “zero authority” to take up the matter.

Pereira, who is known as an outspoken elected official who is often blunt in her criticisms of other people, was punished by the council Monday night for reportedly using derogatory language to describe Palestinians and the city police chief.  She was also criticized for gesturing with her middle finger toward a member of the audience at the January 2 meeting.

  The council voted 13 to 1 to hold Pereira in contempt and strip her of her committee assignments. She will still be able to attend council meetings and take part in votes, according to the Connecticut Post.

 Members of the Palestinian community have been outraged by Pereira’s comments and were calling for her resignation or expulsion from the council.

   The cities of New Haven and Windsor in Connecticut are also considering passing cease-fire resolutions. Several other cities around the country have passed the resolutions including Detroit, Michigan, Atlanta, Georgia and Oakland, California. The resolutions are aimed at pressuring Congress and the Biden administration into taking steps to bring about an end to the brutal Israel-Hamas war, which has now taken 30,000 lives and left 2 million people displaced.

  The International Court of Justice recently found that there was evidence that Israel was a committing genocide in Gaza.

 

 

 

   

Tuesday, July 11, 2023

The state loses a fine leader

   

By Reginald Johnson

 

      Commentary


   The state of Connecticut lost one of its best leaders with the recent passing of Lowell P. Weicker.

The long-time senator and later governor was never afraid to steer an independent course and do what was right.

Weicker, who I covered as a reporter in the 1980s for Fairpress, was the last of an extinct species known as "liberal Republicans." While he was a senator, he was the first Republican to call out former President Nixon for the Watergate abuses and actively took part in the investigation of that scandal. In helping to lead the probe of Watergate, Weicker performed a major service for the country.


Lowell P. Weicker. He served three terms in the U.S. Senate and one term as Connecticut's governor. (Photo Wikimedia Commons)

Later he bucked the conservative drift of the GOP under Ronald Reagan and began to be hated by the Republican right. He even went to Cuba, met with Fidel Castro and praised the communist government. Unfortunately those words came back to haunt him, when Democratic Party senate challenger Joe Lieberman ran a red-baiting campaign, trying to undermine Weicker in pro-defense industry Connecticut. That attack, plus Weicker's lackluster re-election campaign, led to his defeat and loss of his senate seat in 1988.

Weicker jumped back into politics in 1990, winning the state's governorship on an independent slate. There again, he went against the grain and pushed for a long overdue, but highly unpopular, personal income tax. Despite vitriolic opposition, Weicker and his allies were able to push the tax through. Weicker also worked with officials in Bridgeport to help that city climb back from bankruptcy.

Lowell Weicker was not perfect. My understanding was he could be rude at times and a touch arrogant. But if you look at his record on a range of issues, he was really quite good. He left his mark and he will be missed.




Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Native America's rich history

 

 

    By Reginald Johnson

 

  Lucianne Lavin, the author of  “Connecticut’s Indigenous Peoples,” was reading the paper one day when she was taken aback.

  A story covered a lecture she gave on her book and Connecticut Indians and one reader had left the following comment: “Why would anyone want to read a book on Native Americans?  They’ve contributed nothing to our society.”

Lavin said, “I was enraged about this. I really wanted to write something, but I didn’t. I went to bed and thought about it.”

 “I decided to come up with a list of all the things that Native Americans have contributed to the building of America.”

 It was substantial.

 “First of all, 90 percent of our food culture, was actually contributed by Native people,” she said. The list includes corn, which came from the teosinte plant is northern Mexico and was cultivated by Indians more than 8,000 years ago, but also beans and squash.

  “And tomatoes, tomatoes are actually Native American coming out of South America, well before the Italians got it,” Lavin said. Also developed first by Indians were potatoes, which also originated in South America and the Southwest US and then brought to Europe by the Spanish.

 “And chocolate,” Lavin said, “all kinds of things you wouldn’t think were Native American, were Native American”

 Indians also provided the basis for America’s transportation system, said Lavin, who has taught archaeology and anthropology at Connecticut College and other universities.

 “Our American highways system is based on Native American pathways that crisscross the continent,” Lavin said.

 Good examples of that are some of the first “federal roads,” like Routes 1 and 7.

 “Route 7 was part of the old Berkshire path that originally started in the coastal area of Stratford and went up through Western Connecticut going through Schaghticoke and up into Massachusetts, connecting coastal Connecticut communities with major Indian communities and Western Massachusetts," she said. “For example Stockbridge, which was a major Indian town --- it was actually called Indiantown before it was called Stockbridge.”

 Indian pathways were also the basis for much of the United States railroad network.

 Native Americans also had a major impact on the development of American democracy, with the Founders like Thomas Jefferson taking political ideas from Indian tribes.

 “Jefferson and (Benjamin) Franklin actually visited the Iroquois to learn more about their Confederation, which was a democracy. In fact, all of the Native political systems in North America were democracies. They ruled by consensus. Everybody had to agree. That’s why it took so long for Native people to make decisions,” Dr. Lavin said.

  “Our Bill of Rights as well as the Constitution was based on Native American democracies,” she said.

  Other areas where Indians have had a major impact are music, art, sports and medicine.

 “A lot of our herbal doctors are utilizing Native plants and using Native prescriptions on how to use them,” she said.

Finally, Lavin noted Indians have participated in large numbers in the nation’s military. She said that as a percentage of their population Native Americans have the highest participation rate in US military of any ethnic group.

 So the contributions by Native Americans to America have been many and varied.

“What it also shows is not only that Native American communities contributed to the building of America, but that Native history is very much intertwined with American history,” Lavin said.  “I mean Native histories are part of American history --- you can’t separate them. Before the Europeans came, American history was Native history because there were no Europeans here.”

 Dr. Lavin, the director of research and collections emeritus at the Institute for American Indian Studies in Washington, CT, made her comments in a presentation at the Bridgeport Public Library in November and then in a later interview. The talk in Bridgeport coincided with Native American Heritage Month and was entitled “Connecticut’s Indigenous Communities: An Introduction to their Histories and Cultures.”

 Lavin related that indigenous people have been on the North American continent a very long time, predating the arrival of Columbus and other Europeans in the 15th and 16th centuries by thousands of years.

 Archaeological discoveries show signs of human habitation in the southwestern United States going back 36,000 years.

In Connecticut, an archaeological discovery in Avon revealed the presence of a habitation site 12,000 years old.


          

The Pequonnock River Valley in Trumbull. Archaeologists found evidence in the valley of human habitation dating to 7,000 years ago. (Photo by Reginald Johnson)

 While Europeans arrived thinking that they were going to “tame a wild wilderness” only inhabited by “savages,” quite the opposite was true.

  Indigenous people lived in well-organized societies, with a “complicated and sophisticated culture,” Lavin said. People had adequate food and shelter and  health problems were minimal. Tribes were run democratically, and everyone, including women, had a voice in the conduct of tribal affairs.

  “Native women had it so much better than English women,” Lavin noted. “Native women could vote and they could hold office. A number of sachems (chiefs) were squaw sachems in certain Native communities.”

 Indians lived harmoniously with the environment, practicing “land stewardship” ----- long before present-day environmental agencies did.

  “A lot of this had a basis where obviously they knew that if they didn’t practice stewardship, there wouldn’t be any food, and people would die,” she said, adding, “ but there was also spiritual basis behind his stewardship. ‘The Creator’ gave the tribe their homeland and therefore it was their duty to oversee and protect everything on those homelands.”

Lavin estimated that indigenous people in Connecticut lived in a “Golden Age” of culture somewhere between 1000 and 1600.

 But the arrival of Europeans brought disaster for the Native community in New England.

 European traders, as well as the earliest English and Dutch settlers, brought with them diseases that had already hit Europe, such as the plague and smallpox. Indians had not been exposed to these diseases and had no immunity.

   Disease swept through Native communities in the early 17th century, decimating their population. In some cases, tribes became extinct.

“They say anywhere from 70% to 90% of the Native Americans in New England were killed off by 1650,” Lavin said.

 Travelers found that “when they came upon an Indian town, everyone was ill. So many people were ill, they couldn’t help anybody and they just died. It was devastating.”

 Lavin went on, “This is the problem. After the Pequot War in 1637 the English began settling along the coast and the Indians couldn’t stop them because they were a crippled society. You know it’s not just the population, but it’s the leaders in those populations that are killed off.”

 “Think if Covid had killed 77% or 90% of our population?” Lavin asked. “During the pandemic, I think that people who died from Covid, the CDC came out with figures, it’s one third of 1% of our population died from Covid. Think if you had 77% of them dying?”

 Natives also began losing their land, as settlers made continual encroachments to expand farms and steal wood. In many cases Indian land was illegally sold off to other whites.

 Natives also lost land due to cultural differences. Indians had no concept of the word “selling” as it was done in Europe. In Native culture if one person from one tribe approached another Indian in another tribe and asked to use their land the first person would give it to them as a gift or as a temporary loan. The person using the land would later give it back.

 So when Indians were first approached by white settlers about selling their land they thought they were simply giving up their land temporarily. But that was not the case.

  Natives also suffered a disadvantage since they didn’t know English and didn’t know how to read contracts. Sale documents were in English and they were meaningless to them.

 In many cases Natives had their land taken through outright fraud and when they complained to local or state authorities the complaints went unanswered.

  Another factor that hurt Natives economically was the fur trade that developed after the Europeans arrived. While Natives acquired other valuables in return for the trade the number of animals that they needed for food drastically diminished.

  “The whites totally destroyed the Native American economy,” said Lavin. “By 1800, you know, the largest animal in Connecticut were woodchucks.”

  By the 19th century, indigenous people in Connecticut were vastly reduced in number, poor and suffered discrimination at all levels.


     

Native dancers. (Photo Wikimedia Commons)

  According to Lavin, Native leaders realized they had to begin adapting to the new world thrust upon them in order for their people to live.

  They came up with strategies to survive.  First, learn English. They began doing that, in part by joining Christian churches, where missionaries were teaching the Bible in English and helped Natives learn the language.

  Being a Christian also give the Indians some protection from discrimination, Natives believed.

 Another path followed was to join the Anglo-American market economy, Lavin said. Indians took jobs as laborers, farm hands, colliers (charcoal makers), silversmiths, basket weavers, dockworkers and sailors.

Another means of assimilating into society was to join the military. And Natives did that in large numbers, as noted above.

 Today, the number of tribes in Connecticut, officially recognized by the state, is 6. They are the Mohegans, Mashuntucket Pequots and Eastern Pequots in the southeast, the Golden Hill Paugussetts in the southwest and west; and the Schaghticokes (now in two branches) in the northwest.

  But Lavin says there are many more Natives living in Connecticut who are from other tribes, inexplicably not recognized by the state. Among those tribes are the Quinnipiacs in the New Haven-Branford area; the Nipmucks in the east and the Niantics in the southeast.

  In spite of ignorance by many non-Natives about Native-Americans and their history and contributions, as well as ongoing discrimination, inconsistent help from the government and in some cases poverty, indigenous people carry on, maintaining their culture and upholding their traditions.

  In the chapter entitled “A.D. 1633 into the Twenty-First Century” in her book, Dr. Lavin said: “Despite the efforts of archaeologists and social historians, the public tends to believe in inaccurate portrayals of Native histories. Few people have any conception of the continuity of local Native communities, Native preservation of cultural traditions and group identities and the longtime resistance of Native people to the intensive continuous discrimination and detribalization efforts of local and federal governments and non-Native individuals. This book aims to change all that. As Cree-Salish-Kootenai author D'Arcy McNickle wrote: “Only the Indians seemed unwilling to accept oblivion as an appropriate final act in the New World drama… They lost, but were never defeated.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, June 24, 2022

More schools, less bombs

 

By Reginald Johnson


  Peace activists in Connecticut are spreading the word that the United States has to spend less money on the military and wars abroad and more money on addressing domestic needs.

 Members of the Connecticut Peace and Solidarity Coalition recently passed out flyers in Middletown and New Haven urging that the country needs to “Fund Human Needs, Not Killing Machines.”

  They did so at the same time as the “Mass Poor Peoples and Low-Wage Workers’ Assembly” gathered in Washington, D.C., sponsored by the Poor Peoples Campaign.

  That event drew thousands of people demanding that the United States take steps to end poverty and close the enormous wealth divide.

  Coalition member Henry Lowendorf said in Middletown the peace group passed out 50-75 flyers to passersby at the corner of Main Street and Washington Avenue  and engaged a number of people in conversation about the need to reorder the nation’s priorities.

   “Basically what we said was the Poor Peoples Campaign in Washington is having an assembly, trying to change the priorities of this country and trying to focus on people and what people need and one of the planks in the peoples campaign is cutting the military budget. So we support that,” Lowendorf said.

  One of the flyers said that despite a multitude of crises plaguing the country --- including record inflation, lack of affordable housing,  poor health coverage and underfunded schools --- “Washington has no problem proposing a record $813 billion on wars and weapons, half of federal spending.”

 The flyer added, “That’s more than the next 12 countries, including 10 allies, combined. Or finding $53 billion to prolong the war in Ukraine...Spend your tax dollars on human needs, not endless wars!”

  The information sheet pointed out that “Not building just one F-35 nuclear bomber would provide FOOD for over 21,000 3-person families for 1 year”  and “Not funding the new Space Force for 2021 would provide 2.2 million families with MEDICAL CARE for 1 year.”

   The peace and solidarity coalition is also speaking out against the Ukraine war and supporting negotiations to bring peace. The conflict has cost thousands of lives, including civilians and soldiers for both Ukraine and Russia. The United States and other nations in NATO have sent tens of billions of dollars in weaponry to Ukraine.

 The policy of aiding Ukraine has had wide support in Congress and in the media. Generally the American people have backed the effort, as well. But the winds may be shifting as the war drags on, Lowendorf said.

 “I hear more people saying, ‘Where is Ukraine, and why are we sending so much aid. over there?’ ’’ he said.

  Lowendorf  maintained the war in Ukraine is actually a proxy war by the US against Russia, and more people are waking up to this fact. “This not about defending Ukraine’s freedom,” he said.

 Coalition member Steve Krevisky said the group is planning more actions in the coming months.

 

  

 

 

 


  

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Community leaders fight UB merger


 

BRIDGEPORT REPORT

                          

   By Reginald Johnson 

 

   BRIDGEPORT ---- A group of local activists and elected officials are trying to head off  the takeover of the University of Bridgeport by Goodwin University, saying the merger may not be in the best interest of the city or the minority community.

    The group, which includes the president of the Greater Bridgeport NAACP, a state senator and members of the city council, are complaining that community leaders like themselves have been kept out of the deliberations for arranging the merger, and the process has not been transparent.

  The group also questions whether Goodwin, a smaller college than UB which specializes in technical-career-oriented courses aimed at landing people jobs quickly, is not up to the task of running UB, a larger and more established university.

   There’s also fear that tuition rates at the new college may be too expensive for  lower-income minority students to enroll.

   The critics also voice suspicions that Goodwin, based in East Hartford, is not really interested in acquiring UB for academic reasons, but instead wants to buy up valuable waterfront property on Long Island Sound and then sell it off for high-priced housing development.

  The group has talked about various ways of stalling the Goodwin deal --- including legal action to block the merger, trying to get state leaders to consider the possibility of making UB part of the state’s public university system, or using finances from wealthy alumni to pay off UB’s debts and keep the university independent.

  But no definite course of action has been settled upon.

  The president of Goodwin University, Mark Scheinberg, has pushed back hard against the criticism and said the merger is going to be a positive development for both the city and the South End, where UB is located.

  “This is such a win for Bridgeport, and because it is our mission, a win for us, too,” he said.

   The plan for Goodwin to take over UB is far along, with a closing on the purchase of the university property expected within a matter of weeks, said Scheinberg. Once all accreditations are gained, Scheinberg said, the merger would be completed by July. UB would then become a nonprofit institution owned by Goodwin. Paier College, an art school in Hamden, would also be part of the new university.

   The move towards a takeover of the University of Bridgeport began last year, after several years of worsening financial conditions at the 94-year-old college. Scheinberg said he was contacted in June by city leaders, including Mayor Joseph Ganim and members of the higher education community, to see what Goodwin might be able to do to help.

   Then began a period of several weeks of work to hammer out a deal to essentially save UB through a merger. Initially a proposal was devised to have Goodwin, Paier and Sacred Heart University jointly merge with the University of Bridgeport. Later, however SHU officials dropped out of the deal, saying they were concerned about enrollment projections.

  By the fall, several members of the city council and others were expressing concern that the negotiations for finalizing a new arrangement for UB were being done behind closed doors and without adequate input from the council or the minority community.

   Councilman Jorge Cruz, who represents the South End, charged that officials from UB and Goodwin and the mayor were negotiating secretly on a matter that is critically important to the community, without getting any community or council input.

  “They’ve shown us total disrespect,” said Cruz.

The Rev. D. Stanley Lord, president of the Greater Bridgeport NAACP, said minority involvement in the process was not being taken seriously enough.

  “If they were really concerned about Bridgeport as a whole, they would’ve had a community conversation,” he said. “We don’t want somebody coming in here and just say ‘we’re going to do what we want with you,’ without talking with us.”

   State Sen. Dennis Bradley, D-Bridgeport, the spokesman for the group, (which doesn’t have a name), said  “So the issue is, there’s a lot happening behind the doors, behind the scenes and I think that’s not good … I think for something to be done right, whether it’s a private business or public business, specifically if it’s public, it should be done openly and transparently when it affects such a large entity like ourselves.”

   Scheinberg acknowledged that in the early stages, there wasn’t much outreach to anyone outside of the people directly involved in planning a merger. But he maintained that now, lines of communication are much better.

  “We were contacted in June by city government and members of our association to see if there was some way we could step in to help an ailing University of Bridgeport so we had about three weeks to put together a basic shell of a deal and other than my attorney, I didn’t talk with anybody and that’s a screening fact process and it takes years to do this stuff,” he said.

 “So when we did the initial announcement the only person I had talked to in the government in Bridgeport was actually the mayor to make sure I wasn’t mis- stepping and so you do the proper thing --- you check into the local government administration supporting this, so that’s what I did,” Scheinberg said.

  “After that day it was apparent to us that there were some people in the community that didn’t feel as though we were well enough in touch with them before the announcement took place. We took that the heart,” he said.

  At that point, Scheinberg said, he began calling Councilman Cruz “every couple of weeks whenever anything new was happening, I made sure to give him a call.”      

   Goodwin officials also met with the entire Bridgeport state delegation to give them input. They’ve also met with different church leaders, with local and private schools and with a council committee.

  “So there’s nothing that we’re trying to hide,” Scheinberg says, “it was simply a situation where things happen so quickly we hadn’t dug deeper into every layer of the government down there…Nothing is being held back, it’s just we didn’t have time to get to as many people as we would’ve liked.”




  Critics in the community are also worried about whether Goodwin will have a positive effect on the minority community. Bridgeport is a majority minority city and the South End’s population is heavily Black and Latino.

Bradley, an attorney in Bridgeport, said key issues for the group include minority involvement in the university, linking the university with the minority community and making the tuition structure accessible for minorities.

 “Universities have been priced out for a lot of students and I don’t personally believe that the university should be only available to the sons and daughters of the rich or that people in my situation should be burdened with astronomical levels of debt,” he said.

  Bradley added, “the University of Bridgeport for better or worse has always been an institution or one of the few institutions that allows for first-time college kids to come in and pay reasonable rates to get a degree and offer up robust programs of a four-year institution. So yeah, we want to make sure that continues.”

  In response to the issue about tuition, Scheinberg first noted that the University of Bridgeport historically has offered a lot of programs with the city and city residents to provide a substantial amount of institutional financial aid to those students to make sure they could start and finish at UB.

  “They have been very generous to the Bridgeport community. And the question is what will Goodwin do. Goodwin is about the lowest price private college in Connecticut and one of the lowest in the region. We have not raised our tuition in years, our students are very heavily supported by lots of institutional aid as well as other aid; we are a main trainer for SNAP recipients; we are main trainer for Department of Children and Families. Our contracts are hugely supportive of lower income people,” he said.

  On tuition levels, the Goodwin official said, “We will do our best. For any private college you have to do the best you can when you’re in a situation where you don’t get any state support.”  

 Unlike the state community college system or the state university system, Goodwin doesn’t get “tens of thousands of dollars for every student they serve,” he said. “For us we don’t have that and we are still trying to make our programs accessible to local residents.”

   On the issue of involvement by the university in the community, members of the critics' group, including Cruz and Bradley, say they want to make sure that Goodwin continues with the kinds of helpful programs UB has in the schools and in the community, such as providing interns for nonprofits, running computer camps and a health clinic.

Scheinberg said, “I don’t know if they get credit for the many things they (UB) already do and that’s just the beginning. For us, when we get there we will run many programs in addition to that in support of the community.”

 Another concern that has been raised by the community group is whether or not Goodwin has a high enough academic caliber to be taking over the much older and more established University of Bridgeport.

  “I think it should be pretty obvious that I don’t know what will qualify Goodwin college operating a four-year institution and I don’t see what’s in their repertoire or in their assets that it’s a model that I find to be a model of one of higher learning,” said Bradley.

  Rev. Lord also voiced concern about Goodwin’s academic credentials and taking over UB.

   “The University of Bridgeport is known to have one of the best engineering schools in the nation,” he said. “Given Goodwin’s repertoire, Goodwin does not cover that area academically. So what are they going to do with that component?”

  Scheinberg said later that Goodwin will retain the Engineering School.

   Goodwin, begun in 1999, has 3317 students and an endowment of about $9 million. Some 1,027 degrees, both associate and bachelor’s degrees, were conferred in 2019-20.

  The University of Bridgeport has 3152 undergraduate students and 2282 post graduates. UB’s endowment is about $34 million.

  The Goodwin website advertises the East Hartford college as a “Career Focused University in CT.”

   The curriculum emphasizes training in a number of technical oriented fields, many not requiring a four-year instruction and with almost no liberal arts courses.

  Bachelor Degree programs include APRN, advanced manufacturing, business administration, childhood study and others.

  There are several master’s programs, including APRN, public health, and education.

 Two-year associate degree programs are offered in nursing, dental hygiene,  manufacturing, funeral service, criminal justice, early childhood education, health science, CNC Machining and other fields.

 Certificates are offered in medical billing, welding and other areas.

 Scheinberg said that a key mission of the college is to get people into paying jobs.

 “At the end of a degree program here, one should expect that as part of our mission people are able to gain a living wage… As a general rule if any of our programs don’t have a 80% placement rate within 90 days they are put on a watchlist because our job is not to create education for its own sake. We don’t have a philosophy major. We don’t have a lot of majors which would be nice in a liberal arts setting but we want to make sure that our graduates can expect to be working when they finish,” he said.

 Scheinberg added, “So we make no bones about it. That’s not to say we don’t have lots of liberal arts or general education courses but in addition to that we want to make sure that they have enough of an emphasis that they are able to come out and get a job, too.”

   The most controversial charge made by critics of the Goodwin takeover has been the claim that real estate development may be a key motivation behind the acquisition.

  Cruz is outspoken on this issue.

  “Their interest here is the land --- it’s prime land. You got the university and the beach there, you got Seaside Park there and that’s prime land and I’m concerned they’re going to gentrify the place. Gentrification is going to spread and the next thing you know the minority population is going to be powerless. We have to stand up to these people,” he said.

  Others, such as Rev. Lord of the NAACP and Councilman Alfredo Castillo echoed Cruz’s concern about a possible “land grab.”

  Scheinberg is clearly upset by the allegation.

 “I’m sort of slack-jawed actually. So on what basis is that assertion being made?” he asked. “That question came up at the city council meeting as well and I was astounded by the question because I never even thought of that is being an option… There is nothing in what we do that would ever, ever suggest that what we’re doing is a land grab down there…What I’ve heard is astounding to me. We’re such good community members.”

 Scheinberg went on, “We’re not asking anybody for money. We’re not asking anybody for a handout. We’re spending about $50 million --- $50 million! This is the kind of thing that is so rare that I don’t expect to be canonized, but you know, for Pete’s sake, people should be appreciative before they start assuming we’re doing anything nefarious.”

   On the issue of financing, the Connecticut Post reports that Goodwin has an agreement with Citizens Bank whereby the bank is writing off $30 million of UB’s $60 million debt. The Post said Goodwin has a letter of intent to take on UB’s remaining $32.5 million in debt, plus invest another $20 million in the venture.

    But the community group is trying to find other options to keep Goodwin from taking over.

   Without giving many details, Cruz said there has been some contact with two wealthy alumni who are willing to put up the financing to absorb all of UB’s debt and keep the university independent.

  “They are alumni and they don’t like what they heard was being discussed and they called to help. They don’t want to see this institution go to somebody outside of Bridgeport and they want to maintain it as an institution to benefit the minority community,” Cruz said.

Bradley and Lord have expressed the desire to get the state to take over UB and put it into the state university system.

   “My view is that the government step in and specifically the governor’s office step in and make UB part of what is a thriving state system of higher education,” said Bradley. “I think that would be the ideal model. I think UConn and the rest of the state schools have a high degree of prestige and a good reputation.”

   

         

       

  

 

 

  

     

    

Wednesday, May 1, 2019

City schools in crisis; kids at risk



  By Reginald Johnson
  

  BRIDGEPORT --- Is the city school system on the verge of collapse?
  Education officials are warning that if the school district doesn’t get millions more dollars than what has been proposed by Mayor Joseph P. Ganim, some schools will be closed and vital services cut.
 Already the over last four years, the Board of Education has eliminated 230 positions and slashed $38 million in spending.  Many services --- such as those provided by guidance counselors, social workers and the parents center --- have been slashed to the bone.
  Officials say that things are so bad that the state might be asked to take over the school system.
  “We will close schools,” said board Chairman John Weldon at a City Council hearing last week. “We will become a school system in name only. We will have buildings that don’t provide the very core services that they exist to provide. Why would anyone send their kids to a school system like that? The school system is being bankrupted. It’s insolvent.”
 Weldon was joined at the hearing by well over 100 school supporters, including parents, teachers and students, who pleaded with city council officials to fully fund the schools, which serve over 20,000 students.
  A second hearing will take place tomorrow (May 2) at 6 pm in the City Council chambers, 45 Lyon Terrace.
  The City Council is working on their budget outline for the city, after Mayor Ganim  proposed a $557 billion budget for city and school funding. The budget flatlines the city contribution for schools, at about $61 million, roughly the same amount as this year.
 But other city departments, including the police and city attorney’s office, are receiving increases. Ganim, up for reelection this year, has also promised city residents a modest tax reduction.
  School officials made clear they need a minimum of $11.5 million more from the city, just to maintain existing levels of service.
  According to state figures, Bridgeport contributes less money to local schools than any other town or city in the state. Bridgeport funds only 26 per cent of the school budget, while the state puts in 74 percent.
 Bridgeport’s per pupil spending is lower than the other largest cities in the state. Figures from the 2017-18  fiscal year show Hartford spending $19,916 per pupil;  New Haven, $18,381; Waterbury, $15,546, and Bridgeport, $14,241.

Hall School in the East End may close if the city doesn't provide the school district with more fuunding.


  City Council Member Kyle Langan, D-132, said the present situation is not acceptable. “What is the message in the numbers?” he asks. “Do we value incarceration over education? Do we believe that more police equates to a safer environment? Do we believe our children are not capable and therefore undeserving of an equal chance? Do we believe we are a lost cause and have no other option but to become a reactive community?
   Langan criticized the fact that police protection and other departments such as the city attorney’s office are getting increases in funding in the mayor’s budget, but not education.
   “When we remove the state and federal aid from our education budget, we as a city, contributed only $61 million to education (11 % of our budget) versus $174 million for public safety,” he said.
The police and city attorney’s office have received regular funding increases since Mayor Ganim was reelected in 2015, while the school board has received almost no increases.
    The city council member said that it was possible to come up with the additional $11.5 million that the school board needs this year. Langan said that if the increases in public safety and city attorneys office together are eliminated and the tax cut is dropped, it would go a long way towards coming up with the needed revenue for schools.
  “The question is, what do we value?.... We can make it,” he said.
 Langan also said that the huge amount of money the city spends on special education --- about $35 million --- can be reduced to generate more funds for education as a whole.  Bridgeport now sends the students that are in need of special education out of district for instruction.
  He said the city can work with the school board to develop a plan for teaching special ed kids in Bridgeport, and reap significant savings. “But that takes leadership,” he said.
  Several of the speakers at last week’s hearing also talked of values --- the paramount need to invest in children and their future. One of those was a teacher from Hall School in the East End --- which could be closed if the district continues to have a funding shortfall.
  “I ask you to look in the eyes of my children and tell them they’re not worth it,” she said.