Thursday, November 12, 2026

America's culture of violence


                  (The following piece by John Miksad originally appeared as a Facebook post. Miksad is a coordinator for the Fairfield chapter of World BEYOND War and coordinator for Chapter 19 of the Veterans for Peace)    


  By John Miksad


We live in a violent society.

We are violent at home and abroad.

We’ve been at war for most of our existence as a country. Our leaders choose violence over diplomacy and we let them out of fear, apathy, ignorance, and propaganda driven xenophobia.

We are ok with spending $1 trillion a year on the Pentagon and having over 750 military bases scattered around the globe in other nations yet our government would violently resist any attempt of another nation to place a military base in Mexico or Canada. Our government has killed 4.5 million people, created 38 million refugees, and wasted $8 trillion in the "War on (of) Terror" and the most we can bring ourselves to say about it is that it was "not successful" and criticize the way we departed from Afghanistan.

Our government (under D and R administrations) has funded, armed, supported, and provided political cover for a apartheid, ethnic cleansing, illegal occupation, war crimes, and genocide with a death toll that we may never know. We never forget the 3000 who died on 9/11, but we sure as hell spend no time thinking about the death and destruction we caused in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Gaza, West Bank, Lebanon, Yemen and so many other places around the world.

We are violent to other people, to animals, to Mother Earth, and even to ourselves (take a look at our suicide and overdose death rates). We routinely choose profit over people, clean water and clean air. As much as we say we love our children and grandchildren, we love our comfortable way of life more. Rather than choosing a sustainable path forward that would avoid suffering for future generations, we maintain an unsustainable status quo. All while the planet heats up, tides rise, species go extinct, wildfires burn out of control, and storms rage more intensely.

We know our industrial farm system abuses billions of animals they raise for our consumption but we turn a blind eye to its cruelty. Television, movies, books, and sporting events glorify violence. We go about our lives while millions of our fellow citizens live in poverty, live without healthcare (including mental healthcare), go bankrupt due to illness, and live on the streets.

We lead the world in mass shootings, assaults, prison population, military spending, weapon sales, guns, murder rate (in industrialized world) and in imposing brutal sanctions on other nations that kill millions of people (38 million since 1971) and create tremendous suffering around the world.

We have been on the brink of nuclear annihilation for 80 years and for a few brief moments feared mass suicide enough to place some constraints on these WMD's. Now all the guardrails are off (thanks to our government) and we find ourselves in a second nuclear arms race always 30 minutes from the apocalypse and we go about our lives as if this is normal.

Like fish who don’t think about being in water, we are so accustomed to the violence of our culture, we don’t even realize we have been swimming in it all our lives.

The first step to any change is understanding the problem. The problem is OUR violence. It is the violence of empire. It is the violence of imperialism. It is the violence of capitalism. It is the violence of white christian supremacy. It is the violence of American "Exceptionalism."

We need to evolve. We need to raise our consciousness and join the struggle for change. We need to become a nation among nations. We need to integrate back into the web of life. We need to build a society that returns as much as it takes. It's the only rational path forward. It is the only sustainable path forward.

Monday, October 19, 2026

BBC: propaganda for NATO


By Reginald Johnson 


                                                 

                                                         Commentary


   In the past few years, I've watched quite a bit of the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). Their international news coverage, particularly compared to American channels, is very good.

  I've been impressed, for instance, by BBC reporting on Gaza and Lebanon, where Israel has been waging genocidal military campaigns killing tens of thousands of civilians. The BBC has often had reporters on the ground, describing the destruction after Israeli strikes and talking with Palestinians or Lebanese survivors.

  There is no other news network that is doing this, that I'm aware of. The US networks have done very little reporting of substance on the carnage in Gaza and Lebanon, and in many cases reports are skewed heavily to the Israeli point of view (see FOX and Newsmax).

 BBC has also done a solid job covering the Iran War and the fighting in Yemen.

 But --- but --- the BBC's coverage of another theatre of conflict --- Ukraine --- is a totally different story.

 BBC's reports on the Ukraine-Russia War are hopelessly one-sided, with the Ukrainian point of view or the NATO perspective being presented almost exclusively. This is propaganda.

 After Russian airstrikes on Ukrainian cities, BBC correspondents are frequently there, talking with witnesses and survivors as they should be. Sometimes apartment buildings have been hit and there are fatalities and many people injured. 

  Civilian targets should not be hit in times of war and the BBC is right to show extensive video footage of the destruction and talk with anyone impacted. But there should be some effort to get comment from the Russian side, and there never is.

 Why was a residential building struck? Are the Russians taking responsibility? Was it a mistake? Are they saying there were military targets in the building?  These are questions that should be asked but are not.

 Meanwhile, BBC offers only skimpy reporting when it comes to Ukrainian attacks on Russian targets. 

 The Ukrainian bombing of the Blueberry company warehouses, for instance, was reported, but I saw no eyewitnesses or survivors being interviewed. Nor was there any effort to speak with Russian officials.

  When a Russian tour bus was struck by a Ukrainian drone in June and 8 people killed, BBC did report this, but I saw no effort by the station to get comment from survivors or get a response from Russian officials, even though the strike constitutes a war crime. 

 Presenters on the BBC sometimes show an open bias in favor of Ukraine and against Russia. Recently I heard presenter Lucy Hockings describe Russian drone attacks on Odessa as "Russian terror strikes."

 It's funny, because I never heard any BBC presenter describe Ukrainian drone strikes in Russia as "Ukrainian terror strikes."  If Russians were interviewed, they might well describe the bombings as "terror strikes."

 Another area of coverage where the BBC --- as well as other stations --- show favoritism towards Ukraine concerns the issue of drone missiles landing outside the borders of Ukraine or Russia.

There have been a number of incidents where drones have landed in nearby countries like Poland, Romania, the Baltic countries, Germany or in the Black Sea. Sometimes damage is caused. Officials in those countries, who are NATO members, invariably point the finger at Russia as being the likely culprit without citing much evidence.

 A prime example of this was in August when German officials reported there had been incidents involving drones at Leipzig Airport. 

 German officials said that one explosives-laden drone hit a Ukrainian cargo plane but failed to detonate due to a faulty detonator. Another drone collided with a plane circling the airport after it was closed due to the other incident.

 Within days German intelligence officials said they suspected the Russians were responsible for the drone hits. A few weeks later the German government said an investigation concluded the Russians were definitely responsible, because of what they said were tell-tale markings found on the damaged drones. 

 Officials said the drone attacks were part of a Russian campaign of hybrid warfare and sabotage against Europe.

 The BBC reported extensively on the drone incidents and cited the German finding.  The station did report that the Russians denied responsibility for the attacks, but beyond that did nothing to get the other side. There were no interviews with Russian officials.

In general, whenever the BBC presents an analysis on the progress of the Ukraine war, the station always seeks out supporters of Ukraine such as members of the Ukrainian parliament, NATO officials, pro-war representatives of the US Congress, officials of the pro-war US think tank the Atlantic Council, and others such as former US Ambassador to Ukraine, William Taylor.

 No Russian officials are sought out, nor are members of US peace groups, some of whom have criticized the war. 

Recently BBC has given extensive airtime to critics of President Donald Trump's decision to relax sanctions on Russia and buy Russian diesel fuel. Trump said the purchase will help ease high diesel prices in the US.

 Critics, including Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky and members of Congress, claim the move gives Russian leader Vladimir Putin a lifeline and undermines Ukraine in the war effort. 

Again, I haven't seen the BBC interviewing any Russians or anyone who supports the move.

Last week BBC brought on former deputy head of NATO Robert Sheriff who denounced Trump saying he was "siding with Putin" and implied he was a traitor.

 Overall the BBC's coverage of the Ukraine-Russia War amounts to a giant public relations campaign on behalf of Ukraine and its NATO allies. It is deeply unprofessional and unjournalistic. 

 The coverage, so-called, helps fuel the narrative that Russia is bent on mercilessly crushing Ukraine and represents a danger to the rest of Europe.

  In so doing, it provides the justification for continuing the war and providing more arms for Ukraine.




Sunday, August 23, 2026

As the world fixates on Hamas, who will disarm the Israeli settlers storming West Bank villages?

( I am republishing here this fine piece by Soumaya Ghannoushi in Middle East Eye about the absolutely terrrible situation in the West Bank where Israeli "settlers" --- really invaders --- are terrorizing Palestinian families and driving them from their homes. Follow the link.)



As the world fixates on Hamas, who will disarm the Israeli settlers storming West Bank villages?: Palestinians are constantly asked to prove their acceptance of Israel's right to exist - yet every day, their own existence is being erased

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

The JFK Coverup continues/The Israel Coverup continues

     By Reginald Johnson


Reports are coming in tonight that in a highly unusual move, the CIA has raided the office of Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, which oversees CIA operations.

The reports aired on conservative stations FOX and Newsmax said that CIA personnel took away boxes of files on both the CIA's controversial MK-Ultra mind control program and CIA reports on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Gabbard was reportedly reviewing the files, prior to their expected release to the public.

The CIA has been in violation for years of a federal law which ordered the full release of all the files concerning the JFK assassination, which took place Nov. 22, 1963.

Many researchers and authors maintain that the CIA, angered by JFK's moves to end the Cold War with Russia, plotted his murder.

More recent reports indicate that the unreleased files concern Israel's possible role in the assassination. Prior to his death, Kennedy had expressed strong reservations about Israel's nuclear weapons development program.

CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou recently said the withheld files on the JFK case deal with Israel.

The reported raid has taken place as President Trump travels to China. Trump had promised to release all the Kennedy files, but that has not happened.

Monday, April 13, 2026

Fund social needs, not war

 

By Reginald Johnson


     

     NORWALK --- How much has the Iran War cost US taxpayers?

    Try $35 billion.

    You read it right --- $35 billion.

   And that's just since February 28, when the US and Israel launched their unprovoked attack on Iran. Since then the cost of the war is running $1 - $2 billion a day.

  If the ceasefire falls apart, as expected, the cost of the war will run over $100 billion in a matter of weeks.

  A growing number of people, including peace advocates and others, are seeing the Iran War as not only illegal and immoral, but a huge theft of taxpayer money that should be used to address a myriad of social needs at home.

One of those is Benjamin Wesley, who gathered with other activists last Sunday on the bridge over I-95 off Exit 16, to hold banners and signs protesting the war and demand that the nation's priorities be redirected.

                                 

Benjamin Wesley protesting the Iran War at Sunday's demonstration in Norwalk.

 "The US government is cutting a number of social programs like Medicare, Medicaid, Head Start and others to fund the war," said Wesley, of the organization The Peace Pact.

 "We're out here today with colleagues from World Beyond War, Veterans for Peace, Jewish Voices for Peace and others to say, bring those resources back home to meet the needs of the people and create a more equitable society," he said.

  The group unfurled a banner that read "Stop the War in Iran" and placed it over the top of the bridge in the view of motorists on the thruway. Members of the group also held signs urging an end to the war and handed out fliers that read "Stop the US taxpayer funded slaughter."

 The demonstration got a good reception from most drivers going by on East Avenue, with many honking their horns in approval or giving the thumbs up. One or two gave the finger.

                           

Demonstrators opposing the Middle East wars in Norwalk. From left to right, Andrew Rice, Benjamin Wesley, John Miksad and Stephanie Carrow.


  The fliers said people can get involved in the anti-war effort by calling members of the state's congressional delegation at 202-224-3121 and demand that the war end and that senators or congress members vote "no" on any more funding for the war.

  "That's the way the Vietnam War ended.  They stopped the funding," said Wesley.

   He also urged people to protest outside Connecticut's many defense contractors, such as Colt Manufacturing and Sikorsky, which receive millions in US dollars to make weapons used by Israel in the wars in Iran, Lebanon and Gaza.

  Local resident Patrick Servidio showed up at the protest dressed as General George Washington.

 "I led the fight for freedom against the British," he said. "Now we are the British."

                           

General George Washington at the protest.

 

  

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Catastrophe looms in Iran War

By Reginald Johnson


The situation in the Iran war is getting ominous.

Trump, who is sounding increasingly erratic and reckless, warned Iran in a social media post today that if the country's leaders don't open the Strait of Hormuz for oil shipments soon, the US would begin destroying Tehran's energy grid.

This would be a disastrous escalation.

I read just yesterday in Global Research an article in which the author said he had been told by top Iranians that if the US were to bomb the Tehran power system, they wouldn't hesitate to fire a missile against the US aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, which has 5,000 naval personnel aboard. The author was quite confident that the massive ship would be sunk, and most of the people on board would die.

Just imagine now what the reaction in this country will be if that happens. The unpopularity of this war will suddenly turn into a bloodlust for revenge. There will be cries to "carpet bomb 'em!" or even use a nuclear weapon. Trump has already threatened to use a nuke, and in this situation, he might just do it.

Frightening beyond words. The world cannot survive a nuclear war, and we might be headed for it.

All I can say is, on Monday, everyone should light up the congressional switchboard in DC with calls to your senators and congressmen, demanding that this insane war on Iran STOP NOW! before we're all killed. The number is 202-224-3121. Please, make a call.