By Reginald Johnson
BRIDGEPORT
---- It was about 12 hours after the horrific act of violence on Thursday morning, in
which nine people were shot, one fatally, at the Trumbull
Gardens low-income housing project.
I had heard about
the shooting after I got up on Thursday, and was watching Channel 12 for
updates. I saw Mayor Bill Finch at the scene expressing his sympathy for the
victims and their families and talking about what steps he was taking to curb
crime. Police Chief Joseph Gaudett was
also on hand to give a statement, and housing officials gave comments as well.
This is all
entirely understandable that the chief elected official of the city, his police
chief and other key officials would show up on the scene after such a terrible
incident had occurred.
This is one of the
worst cases of violence in Bridgeport
in a while, and the mayor in particular had to reassure people about what was
happening to stop further violence. I thought Finch was good, although he went
on a bit too long about the value of one of the the violence prevention
programs he set up, the “Street-Safe” program whereby older men, some reformed
convicts, work with young men in the neighborhood, counsel them, and steer them
away from crime. I thought, if this program is so good, it sure as heck didn’t
work in this case.
The Trumbull Gardens housing project in Bridgeport. One person was killed and eight people wounded in a mass shooting last week outside one of the buildings. |
But what really
threw me off was what I saw when I decided to ride up to Trumbull Gardens a
couple of hours later and take a look around.
Driving down Trumbull
Avenue through the center the complex,
I saw a crowd with TV cameras all around. There was a guy in the middle, white
shirt and tie, waving his hands and talking as if he was holding a press
conference. Then I felt sick to my stomach. It was Joe Ganim, former mayor Bridgeport.
This is the same
Joe Ganim who about 15 years ago was engaging in a variety of corrupt schemes,
making deals with friendly developers at the expense of people in the
neighborhoods, tearing down acres of affordable housing and running a very
secretive administration throughout.
Fortunately, the
feds were onto Ganim’s antics, he was nailed for his crimes, and went to
prison. Served a good long term, I think about eight years.
Now, a la Buddy Cianci
down in Providence, Ganim wants to
make a comeback. He’s running for mayor again. A disbarred lawyer, he tried to
get his law license back after leaving prison, and was most appropriately
turned down. (The idea of a lawyer turned felon being given his license back
after serving time is truly absurd).
But now lots of years
have gone by, and I suppose Ganim is counting on the people of Bridgeport
forgetting his bad deeds, and remembering some of the successes --- including
the construction of the baseball stadium and the arena -- and also on a certain
amount of anti-Finch sentiment out there.
Ganim certainly has
a right to run. He has paid for his crimes, and by all accounts, serving time
in prison is a miserable experience. I’m not questioning his right to run or to
have a decent livelihood. But I am questioning whether he has changed.
I didn’t like what I
saw yesterday. It seemed like classic Ganim, while the cameras are rolling, you
make a splash. The mayor of the city had just been there, the crime was still
only 12 hours old, and all the press was there.
It wasn’t as if
Ganim said, ‘after this has settled down, maybe in a couple of days, I’ll come
out and talk to people about possible ideas for combating crime.’ I would have
respected that. The problem is, there would have been no cameras.
Ganim told the
Connecticut Post he knew some of the victims, and wanted to set up a vigil that
day. Really. Two hours after the mayor was there.
There were vigils at
St. Vincent’s Hospital and Bridgeport
Hospital, and I don’t have a
problem with Ganim attending them.
But for candidate
Ganim to set up a vigil at Trumbull Gardens
not long after his rival the mayor had been there --- only 12 hours after a
terrible tragedy --- struck me as not sincere, politically expedient and
inappropriate.
I’m particularly
skeptical about Ganim’s intentions, since he did so precious little for
low-income neighborhoods like Trumbull
Gardens when he was mayor. I know
it’s said some black leaders liked him, but I knew some community activists who didn’t like him and felt he didn’t listen to them. As said, he razed
hundreds of low-income units to build projects that quite frankly, the public
had little say in.
But now he’s got
religion.
I’ll conclude by
saying I am not a great fan of Bill Finch as mayor, although he’s a decent guy
in person. I am open about who to like for mayor, and could support an
independent or even a Republican.
But unless Joe
Ganim starts making people walk on water, I know that’s one person I won’t cast
a ballot for.
Nicely said Reginald. Fool me twice...
ReplyDeleteNicely said Reginald. Fool me twice...
ReplyDeleteThanks, Doug.
ReplyDelete