JFK's call for peace should be heeded today

    

By Reginald Johnson

        Commentary  

    It's been 60 years since President John F. Kennedy gave the commencement address at American University in Washington, D.C., calling for peaceful coexistence with Russia. The address has been called one of the most important speeches in US history. Here's a brief excerpt:

"What kind of peace do I mean? What kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children --- not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women --- not merely peace in our time but peace for all time."

We can learn from Kennedy's words today. As tensions surrounding the war between Ukraine and Russia mount, it is critical that we find every possible way to bring about a peaceful resolution to this conflict, to avoid the unthinkable. The possibility of nuclear war between the US, which backs Ukraine, and Russia, is not out of the question. As Prof. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia says in an interview about Kennedy's speech and its relevance today, the people who dismiss the possibility of a nuclear war "don't understand the world we live in." Sachs also said that US policies have been "shockingly dangerous" and led to "shocking devastation in Ukraine." Below is the interview with Prof. Sachs:

YOUTUBE.COM

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on how we can make peace with Russia by learning from JFK's example

Watch the full video here: https://youtube.com/live/wRTx6wq

Sailing for peace

 

By Reginald Johnson

               

   From Hawaii to San Francisco, to cities along the Great Lakes and now to Connecticut and New England, the "Golden Rule"  is spreading the message that the world needs to abolish nuclear weapons.

     The 30-foot sailboat, named after the ethical principle of treating others as you would like to be treated, has logged more than 22,000 miles in recent years as part of an educational campaign by Veterans for Peace aimed at bringing about nuclear disarmament.

    With red sails emblazoned with the peace symbol and the Veterans for Peace logo, the boat also has a black banner on its side which reads, "Ban Nuclear Weapons. Sign the Treaty."

   "We're trying to stop the possibility of nuclear war by educating people about what they can do, " said Helen Jaccard, project manager for the VFP's "Golden Rule Project"  during a stopover by the boat in New Haven last weekend.

  "We talk about the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and passing 'Back from the Brink' measures, which includes, in addition to the treaty, taking away the President's sole authority to launch a nuclear first strike; taking away the $2 trillion nuclear modernization program; and taking nuclear weapons off hair trigger alert."

        

The Golden Rule sail boat at the Long Wharf pier in New Haven. The vessel has traveled 22,000 miles and visited cities and towns throughout the continental US and Hawaii as crew members and others with Veterans for Peace spread the message that nuclear weapons must be abolished. (Photo by Reginald Johnson)

                               

 In New Haven, there were several days of events in connection with the boat's arrival, including a tour of the New Haven Peace Garden, a presentation at the Sound School Festival and a public welcome by city officials and comments by Jaccard, local peace activists and others at Long Wharf Park, where the Golden Rule was docked.

   Over the Memorial Day weekend, the peace boat was in Norwalk.

  Later this week, the Golden Rule will sail up to New London and then it's onto Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Maine.

   Jaccard said the mission to bring about nuclear disarmament is more urgent than ever, as the United States keeps pumping Ukraine with billions of dollars in military aid to wage a proxy war against Russia. As the war grows more intense, the chances rise of a confrontation between nuclear-armed United States and nuclear-armed Russia.

  Veterans for Peace nationally has criticized the Biden administration's military support for Ukraine and called for a cease-fire and negotiated peace.

   Jaccard said the danger of a nuclear war is as great now as it was during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when a nuclear war between the US and the then Soviet Union was narrowly avoided.

  Commenting on Ukraine, Jaccard said, "Both Russia and the United States have said all options are on the table. You know what that means? Threatening nuclear war."

  The UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons bans the production, testing, use and transfer of weapons under international law. The treaty has 42 countries signing on, but not the nuclear-armed countries including the United States, Russia, Britain, France, India and Pakistan.

  Jaccard said some progress is being made to move the needle and get the treaty signed by the US and approve other related measures. She said 5 states have now passed resolutions calling on Congress and the President to sign the treaty.

  "I do see nuclear weapons more at the table of conversation," she said.

  The history of the Golden Rule actually goes back to 1958, when Quaker peace activists (including Albert Bigelow of Cos Cob) sailed the craft to the Marshall Islands in the Pacific to protest US atomic bomb testing. The Coast Guard stopped the vessel and the crew was arrested, prompting an international outcry.

  According to a brochure on the Golden Rule, "rising public awareness of the dangers of radiation led to worldwide demands to stop nuclear testing." Later the US under President Kennedy signed the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty with Russia and the United Kingdom in 1963.

  The boat was used for a number of more years and then fell into disuse in northern California. The boat later sank in a storm in Humboldt Bay. But in 2010, veterans and others decided to salvage the boat and restore it. By 2015, work was completed and and the Golden Rule began making tours.

 One of the speakers at the Long Wharf event gave first-hand testimony about the dangers of atomic bomb testing. Hank Bolden of Cheshire said he was a teen-ager in the Army in 1955 when he and others in his unit were exposed to nuclear fallout during bomb testing in Nevada. Bolden said the Army never warned them in advance that they were going on a mission where atomic bombs were being tested.

                   

Hank Bolden, a Korean War vet and atomic testing survivor, speaks about his experiences. Bolden has endured multiple cancers since he was exposed to radiation from an atomic bomb test in 1955. (Photo by Reginald Johnson)

  "They put soldiers in the path (of the explosion). They wanted to find out how soldiers would react in a nuclear environment," he said. "I was exposed to ionizing radiation so badly that when the bomb dropped, when you held your hands up, you could see the bones in your hand," he said.

  Over the years, Bolden, 86, has endured multiple cancers. He is one of two surviving veterans who were exposed to atomic testing. A number of articles have been written about Bolden and others in the military who were exposed to testing.

  "I invite you to go on the internet and see what you may or may not believe about what the federal government will do to you," Bolden said.

    One of the crew members on the Golden Rule spoke about why he decided to take part in the Veterans for Peace project. Bill Good of Ohio said, "I think this an opportunity to at least bring some awareness, get people thinking of how we can get rid of these nuclear weapons and point out how much of our money and taxes go to fund these weapons and how we can take that money and use it for much better purposes, like education, housing and health care and make a better society."

  

                              

Crew members Captain Kiko Johnston-Kitazawa of Hawaii and Bill Good of Ohio stand next to the Golden Rule.

 (Photo by Reginald Johnson)

     (For more information about the Golden Rule, go to www.VFPGoldenRule.org)

  

 

  

  

G-7 leaders promise peace, then back war

  

   By Reginald Johnson

     

    Commentary

   

   During the G-7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan, world leaders laid wreaths at the Hiroshima Memorial, which commemorates the atomic bombing in 1945 at the end of World War II.

  The American bombing of Hiroshima on August 6 of that year, together with the bombing of Nagasaki three days later, killed over 200,000 innocent civilians. The savage attacks constituted the worst war crimes in history.

  It was the first and only time --- so far ---that nuclear weapons have been used. The bombings ushered in the nuclear arms race and left the world’s population living in a permanent state of fear of potential nuclear annihilation.

  “Here we remember the terrible cost of war,” said Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission. “And we are reminded of our duty to preserve peace.”

 What hypocrisy.

 The G-7 leaders, mostly from western countries, were not remembering “the terrible cost of war,” and they certainly weren’t heeding any “duty to preserve peace.”

  Instead, this cabal of warmakers spent most of the summit discussing ways to help Ukraine “win” its war with Russia. European leaders talked about what further sanctions they would apply against Russia to strangle the Russian economy and undermine the stability of the Russian government.

  The group also heard President Biden announce that he had agreed to have US military personnel train Ukrainian pilots on how to fly F-16 fighter jets. While Biden said that the US was not itself going to provide the planes, some of its European allies would agree to do that.

  So this means that Ukraine will get an advanced fighter jet in the war against Russia and ramps up an already intense conflict.

  The Ukraine-Russia War, underway for 15 months, has already left 300,000 dead or wounded and forced millions of refugees to flee the country. With Russia nuclear-armed and the US and its NATO allies also nuclear-armed, there’s the possibility that the war could turn nuclear.

 By allowing F-16s to be used by the Ukrainian armed forces, Biden reversed his earlier pledge saying that he would not do this because such a step meant the warplanes could be used to hit targets deep inside Russia and thus was potentially a dangerous escalation in the war.

The memorial in Hiroshima, Japan commemorating the thousands of innocent people killed when the US dropped an atomic bomb on August 6, 1945 

  According to the New York Times, this is the latest promise that Biden has broken regarding giving advanced weaponry to Ukraine, including HIMARS rocket launchers, Patriot air defense missile systems and Abrams tanks.

  “In each case, the president at first refused, only to change his mind under pressure from European allies,” the Times reported in its May 20 addition.

  Revelations by a military whistleblower in April also disclosed that the US has dispatched a small number of US combat personnel to Ukraine despite pledges by Biden previously that he would never do that because it could touch off  “World War III.”

  According to the Times, the allied leaders at the G-7 summit issued a joint statement in which they said they were committed to “continuing our security assistance to Ukraine as it defends itself against Russia’s aggression tailoring our support to Ukraine’s needs.” The report added that the group vowed to provide “financial, humanitarian, military and diplomatic support to Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

  So there you have the commitment to “peace” by the G-7 leaders. They are pledged to advance war and little else.

  It is galling that this group of leaders would dare to meet in Hiroshima, Japan, a sacred place, and insist they were promoting peace with their aggressive Ukraine war policy --- which could lead to a nuclear war wiping out the human race.

 The Orwellian claim that more war will create peace must be rejected. It is encouraging that protests took place outside the G-7 summit. Protests around the world need to spread until this misbegotten war ends and a nuclear catastrophe --- which would dwarf what happened in Hiroshima --- is averted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Was Tucker Carlson fired over Ukraine?

  By Reginald Johnson

   Commentary

 

   There’s been a lot of opinions offered about what triggered the firing last month of top-rated cable TV host Tucker Carlson by FOX.

  Many speculated that the Murdoch family that owns FOX were angry over a number of things, including comments Carlson made about possible election fraud in the 2020 election, the sexual discrimination complaint against Carlson, and the talk show host’s controversial show questioning the official narrative concerning the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot.

 But few people have brought up the possibility that Carlson’s criticism of US involvement in Ukraine --- and specifically an editorial Carlson gave during his last broadcast on April 21 accusing the US of running bio warfare labs in Ukraine might have been his undoing.

  One person who has raised this, ironically, is an anchor with a Murdoch-owned operation in Australia, Sky News Australia.

  Andrew Bolt of Sky News said it was his “suspicion” that Rupert Murdoch’s son Lachlan Murdoch --- who he claimed fired Carlson --- was furious over Carlson’s claim that the United States was maintaining bio-labs “in a primitive country like Ukraine as well as sensitive nuclear technology.”

   Bolt commented “many of his viewers would’ve taken that to imply that the US is helping Ukraine with biological, secret biological, weapons research, even nuclear weapons.” Bolt said “that is crap, but it’s dangerous crap.”

  Bolt noted that Lachlan Murdoch had previously visited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and had what he termed “warm conversations and that Murdoch had donated to a fund for journalists.”

  It also should be noted that Lachlan’s father Rupert also had visited visited with Zelensky and apparently was on good terms with the Ukrainian president.

  So it is quite possible that Zelensky put pressure on the Murdochs to do something about Tucker Carlson since Carlson was the only mainstream news commentator who has, since the beginning of the Ukrainian conflict with Russia, criticized the US support for the war.  He maintained that aid to Ukraine was not in America’s strategic interest and warned that continued aid might lead to a direct confrontation with Russia.

  Since he left FOX, Carlson has not spoken about the reasons for his firing. He is still under contract with FOX and the contractual terms likely prohibit him from making any comments.

 It is interesting to note that while many of Carlson’s shows are still available on the FOX News website the commentary Carlson gave on April 21 concerning the bio labs is gone. I have searched everywhere for it, including on You Tube, and I can't find it.

  It is also a troubling fact that the Murdochs apparently have this friendly relationship with the leader of a country that the United States is so deeply involved in, a nation which is at war with a nuclear armed power. That kind of cozy relationship certainly has to send a message to everybody in the FOX News organization that they better not be critical of Ukraine or the US aid for the war effort.

  We won’t know the real reasons for Carlson’s dismissal until the former talk show host is willing to go public and speak about it. It’s possible that could happen sooner rather than later because there are some rumors now that Carlson is talking about breaking his contract with FOX and starting some sort of independent media operation with mega-billionaire Elon Musk.

  One other interesting point is that since Carlson left any questioning of US support for Ukraine has been dropped at FOX.

   Like the other cable channels and news outlets, including newspapers like the New York Times, FOX reports the Ukraine War in a one-sided manner. Ukraine is portrayed as an innocent party in the war against Russia, a small country attacked by a brutal aggressor without any provocation. US aid is seen as vital and a “moral imperative.”

  But the media narrative leaves out the long lead-up to the war and the many provocations against Russia, including the US-instigated right-wing coup in Ukraine in 2014, leading to the establishment of a virulently anti-Russian regime in Kiev whose leaders included a number of neo-Nazis; the construction of many NATO bases in recent years close to Russia in Romania and Poland; the willful breaking of the Minsk peace agreement by the Ukrainian government, with the silent backing of the United States; the delivery of tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine by the US; and the massing of Ukrainian Army troops in eastern Ukraine just prior to the Russian invasion in February of last year.

 

Former lawmaker blasts approval for housing at the former Testo's restaurant

    

By Reginald Johnson

 

 BRIDGEPORT REPORT     

     BRIDGEPORT --- City officials have given the green light for the development of a high density housing complex at the site of the former Testo’s restaurant on Madison Avenue and a former North End political leader is furious that there was no public hearing on the matter.

 Zoning officials gave an administrative approval to the project which will entail the construction of 177 residential units at the corner of Madison and Westfield Avenue in the heart of the North End, an area which is dominated by single-family homes. Under the new master plan and zoning regulations a public hearing was not required, officials said.

  And that’s what has Chris Caruso, a former state representative and city council member, up in arms.

  “When you think about it, to put a 177-unit complex with underground parking and the public hasn’t been able to speak on traffic, noise, density or any of those issues, it’s wrong. I believe in a public hearing. If the people are for it, by all means come out and speak in favor of it or if you’re against it come out and speak against.  But to take away that constitutional right of a public hearing to me is just an abomination,” Caruso said.

City officials have approved the construction of 177 housing units at the site of the former Testo's Restaurant, 1775 Madison Avenue. (Reginald Johnson photo)

    Caruso said he planned to speak at the public forum prior to Monday’s City Council meeting and ask that the council demand that the planning and zoning commission place a moratorium on the new master plan and regulations until there’s been a closer review of their impact. Caruso said that he would pressure Mayor Joseph P. Ganim to call for a moratorium as well.

  Additionally, the former legislator said he would call on the mayor to ask the city attorney “to investigate a statute or local law to see if we can change this development in the sense of holding a public hearing. I think the absence of a public hearing is unconscionable.”

 Testo's Ristorante, a landmark in the North End, was closed at the end of last year. The long-time owner and proprietor was Mario Testa, who ran the Democratic Town Committe for years and is a close ally of Ganim. The restaurant, which also had a catering hall, hosted many town committee meetings and election parties.

 Paul Boucher, the city zoning director, did not return a call for comment. The two city council members who represent the 133rd council district, which includes 1775 Madison Avenue --- Jeanette Herron and Aikeem Boyd --- also could not be reached.

 Caruso said he will not let up in his fight.

 "I'm going to pursue this. If they don't want us to have a public hearing, there will be a hearing in Bridgeport, because I will organize one and bring everyone out. This is something that needs to be fought," he said.

 

US closer to full-out war with Russia

By Reginald Johnson 

 

  Are we moving closer to a hot war with Russia?

  It certainly looks that way.

   Contradicting previous statements by the Biden administration, new information shows the US now has a small number of combat troops on the ground in Ukraine, and some are reportedly deployed with Ukrainian forces fighting Russia in the eastern part of the country.

 The recent leak of classified Pentagon documents by Air National Guardsman Jack Teixiera disclosed that 14 US Special Forces troops are in Ukraine, along with more than 80 special forces troops from other NATO countries, including the UK and France, according to a report in the BBC.

  Information in the leaked documents didn’t say where the troops are deployed or how they’re being used, according to the story. Pentagon spokesman  Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder confirmed last November that the US had a small contingent of military personnel in Ukraine connected with the US embassy, but they were there only to inspect deliveries of weapons to Ukraine and would not be involved in combat. 

 However, Special Forces are elite fighting units in the Army and are not generally connected with embassies or used for inspections.

  Also, Democratic Party presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr said on the Tucker Carlson show last week on FOX that his son had been deployed to Ukraine as a Special Forces “machine gunner” and fought alongside Ukrainian forces against the Russian army during “the Kharkiv campaign.”

 The leaked documents also showed the administration has been lying about progress by Ukraine in the war, with statements by officials like Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austen that Ukraine was doing well, with Russian military strength “waning.”.

For the past year, US officials have painted a rosy picture of how well Ukrainian forces are doing in the war with Russia. But the recent leak of Pentagon documents tells a different story.

   To the contrary, the documents reveal that Ukraine is suffering a high casualty rate, with seven Ukrainians dying for every one Russian. Also the information shows that Ukraine’s air defense system is nearly destroyed.

  In the wake of the new information, some Republicans in Congress are pressing the administration to make clear exactly what US forces are doing in Ukraine.

  “We’ve been engaged over there for a year and we’ve been hearing ‘transparency’ and ‘we will not let troops on the ground.’  Sadly, we now get information like this,” said Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana on the Tucker Carlson show on FOX April 20^th.

  “A few days ago we filed a letter (to the administration), tell us, who authorized this, how many are actually there, and what are they doing?” said Braun.

  It could not be learned how many other members of Congress had signed onto the letter and who they were.

  Braun commented to Carlson that “This is eerily familiar to what we should have learned decades ago in Vietnam. Mission creep comes into play. Afghanistan, Iraq --- it looks like it’s reeling all over again. The big difference is, this is where two world wars started.  Much different setting, much different context. We’re going to be sure to get to the bottom of this.”

 On his April 13^th show, Carlson said the leaked information “in fact shows that this is not Ukraine’s war. It is our war. The US is a direct combatant in the new war against Russia. As we speak American soldiers are fighting Russian soldiers. So this is not a regional conflict in Eastern Europe. This is a hot war between the two primary nuclear superpowers on earth. And yet this war has never been formally declared – it has not been authorized by Congress.

 “That means this war is a violation of American law. It is a crime,” he said.

Carlson and another guest on his show, investigative writer Glenn Greenwald decried the media’s performance in covering the Pentagon leak. Both charged that the press showed more interest in helping the government catch the person responsible for the leak and punish him, rather than reporting on the contents of the leak and their significance.

 Teixeira should be “celebrated” for the public service he performed, rather than demonized, Greenwald said.

Tucker Carlson, Ukraine War critic, pushed out

   By Reginald Johnson

    Commentary

 

   For those who care about the danger of US militarism, ending the proxy war in Ukraine, protecting free speech and forcing accountability from the nation's intelligence agencies, the departure of Tucker Carlson from FOX News is a big loss.

Carlson had in-depth shows on all those topics, unlike other commentators at FOX and news outlets like MSNBC and CNN.

I agree with Glenn Greenwald who wrote on Twitter:

 "Tucker was the cable host who most: * Opposed US proxy war in Ukraine; * Denounced CIA, FBI and DHS for its systemic lies and corruption; * Devoted himself to a pardon for Julian Assange; * Objected to regime change efforts in Cuba; * Criticized Trump Admin's militarism."

 Who's going to speak out on these issues now in the mainstream media? I don't know of anyone.

 Carlson would regularly bring in thoughtful, independent-minded and often progressive guests to talk about civil liberties and foreign policy issues --- including Jill Stein, Medea Benjamin, Aaron Mate, Dan Kovalik, Tulsi Gabbard, the late Stephen Cohen, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr and Greenwald.

 I particularly appreciated Carlson's outfront coverage on the Ukraine War. Right from the beginning, really months before the Russian invasion and the full-scale conflict began, Carlson was raising questions about America's role in Ukraine. He became a harsh critic of US involvement, and this showed a lot of guts, seeing as no other media voices, including those at FOX, were raising questions. 

 Carlson was a Republican so I didn't agree with him on several domestic issues. He can be faulted for a number of things, but that shouldn't wipe out his good work on a range of important topics.