Thursday, May 25, 2023

G-7 leaders promise peace, then back war

  

   By Reginald Johnson

     

    Commentary

   

   During the G-7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan, world leaders laid wreaths at the Hiroshima Memorial, which commemorates the atomic bombing in 1945 at the end of World War II.

  The American bombing of Hiroshima on August 6 of that year, together with the bombing of Nagasaki three days later, killed over 200,000 innocent civilians. The savage attacks constituted the worst war crimes in history.

  It was the first and only time --- so far ---that nuclear weapons have been used. The bombings ushered in the nuclear arms race and left the world’s population living in a permanent state of fear of potential nuclear annihilation.

  “Here we remember the terrible cost of war,” said Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission. “And we are reminded of our duty to preserve peace.”

 What hypocrisy.

 The G-7 leaders, mostly from western countries, were not remembering “the terrible cost of war,” and they certainly weren’t heeding any “duty to preserve peace.”

  Instead, this cabal of warmakers spent most of the summit discussing ways to help Ukraine “win” its war with Russia. European leaders talked about what further sanctions they would apply against Russia to strangle the Russian economy and undermine the stability of the Russian government.

  The group also heard President Biden announce that he had agreed to have US military personnel train Ukrainian pilots on how to fly F-16 fighter jets. While Biden said that the US was not itself going to provide the planes, some of its European allies would agree to do that.

  So this means that Ukraine will get an advanced fighter jet in the war against Russia and ramps up an already intense conflict.

  The Ukraine-Russia War, underway for 15 months, has already left 300,000 dead or wounded and forced millions of refugees to flee the country. With Russia nuclear-armed and the US and its NATO allies also nuclear-armed, there’s the possibility that the war could turn nuclear.

 By allowing F-16s to be used by the Ukrainian armed forces, Biden reversed his earlier pledge saying that he would not do this because such a step meant the warplanes could be used to hit targets deep inside Russia and thus was potentially a dangerous escalation in the war.


The memorial in Hiroshima, Japan commemorating the thousands of innocent people killed when the US dropped an atomic bomb on August 6, 1945 


  According to the New York Times, this is the latest promise that Biden has broken regarding giving advanced weaponry to Ukraine, including HIMARS rocket launchers, Patriot air defense missile systems and Abrams tanks.

  “In each case, the president at first refused, only to change his mind under pressure from European allies,” the Times reported in its May 20 addition.

  Revelations by a military whistleblower in April also disclosed that the US has dispatched a small number of US combat personnel to Ukraine despite pledges by Biden previously that he would never do that because it could touch off  “World War III.”

  According to the Times, the allied leaders at the G-7 summit issued a joint statement in which they said they were committed to “continuing our security assistance to Ukraine as it defends itself against Russia’s aggression tailoring our support to Ukraine’s needs.” The report added that the group vowed to provide “financial, humanitarian, military and diplomatic support to Ukraine for as long as it takes.”

  So there you have the commitment to “peace” by the G-7 leaders. They are pledged to advance war and little else.

  It is galling that this group of leaders would dare to meet in Hiroshima, Japan, a sacred place, and insist they were promoting peace with their aggressive Ukraine war policy --- which could lead to a nuclear war wiping out the human race.

 The Orwellian claim that more war will create peace must be rejected. It is encouraging that protests took place outside the G-7 summit. Protests around the world need to spread until this misbegotten war ends and a nuclear catastrophe --- which would dwarf what happened in Hiroshima --- is averted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunday, May 7, 2023

Was Tucker Carlson fired over Ukraine?


  By Reginald Johnson


   Commentary

 

   There’s been a lot of opinions offered about what triggered the firing last month of top-rated cable TV host Tucker Carlson by FOX.

  Many speculated that the Murdoch family that owns FOX were angry over a number of things, including comments Carlson made about possible election fraud in the 2020 election, the sexual discrimination complaint against Carlson, and the talk show host’s controversial show questioning the official narrative concerning the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot.

 But few people have brought up the possibility that Carlson’s criticism of US involvement in Ukraine --- and specifically an editorial Carlson gave during his last broadcast on April 21 accusing the US of running bio warfare labs in Ukraine might have been his undoing.

  One person who has raised this, ironically, is an anchor with a Murdoch-owned operation in Australia, Sky News Australia.

  Andrew Bolt of Sky News said it was his “suspicion” that Rupert Murdoch’s son Lachlan Murdoch --- who he claimed fired Carlson --- was furious over Carlson’s claim that the United States was maintaining bio-labs “in a primitive country like Ukraine as well as sensitive nuclear technology.”

   Bolt commented “many of his viewers would’ve taken that to imply that the US is helping Ukraine with biological, secret biological, weapons research, even nuclear weapons.” Bolt said “that is crap, but it’s dangerous crap.”

  Bolt noted that Lachlan Murdoch had previously visited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and had what he termed “warm conversations and that Murdoch had donated to a fund for journalists.”

  It also should be noted that Lachlan’s father Rupert also had visited visited with Zelensky and apparently was on good terms with the Ukrainian president.

  So it is quite possible that Zelensky put pressure on the Murdochs to do something about Tucker Carlson since Carlson was the only mainstream news commentator who has, since the beginning of the Ukrainian conflict with Russia, criticized the US support for the war.  He maintained that aid to Ukraine was not in America’s strategic interest and warned that continued aid might lead to a direct confrontation with Russia.

  Since he left FOX, Carlson has not spoken about the reasons for his firing. He is still under contract with FOX and the contractual terms likely prohibit him from making any comments.

 It is interesting to note that while many of Carlson’s shows are still available on the FOX News website the commentary Carlson gave on April 21 concerning the bio labs is gone. I have searched everywhere for it, including on You Tube, and I can't find it.

  It is also a troubling fact that the Murdochs apparently have this friendly relationship with the leader of a country that the United States is so deeply involved in, a nation which is at war with a nuclear armed power. That kind of cozy relationship certainly has to send a message to everybody in the FOX News organization that they better not be critical of Ukraine or the US aid for the war effort.

  We won’t know the real reasons for Carlson’s dismissal until the former talk show host is willing to go public and speak about it. It’s possible that could happen sooner rather than later because there are some rumors now that Carlson is talking about breaking his contract with FOX and starting some sort of independent media operation with mega-billionaire Elon Musk.

  One other interesting point is that since Carlson left any questioning of US support for Ukraine has been dropped at FOX.

   Like the other cable channels and news outlets, including newspapers like the New York Times, FOX reports the Ukraine War in a one-sided manner. Ukraine is portrayed as an innocent party in the war against Russia, a small country attacked by a brutal aggressor without any provocation. US aid is seen as vital and a “moral imperative.”

  But the media narrative leaves out the long lead-up to the war and the many provocations against Russia, including the US-instigated right-wing coup in Ukraine in 2014, leading to the establishment of a virulently anti-Russian regime in Kiev whose leaders included a number of neo-Nazis; the construction of many NATO bases in recent years close to Russia in Romania and Poland; the willful breaking of the Minsk peace agreement by the Ukrainian government, with the silent backing of the United States; the delivery of tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine by the US; and the massing of Ukrainian Army troops in eastern Ukraine just prior to the Russian invasion in February of last year.

 

Monday, May 1, 2023

Former lawmaker blasts approval for housing at the former Testo's restaurant

    

By Reginald Johnson

 

 BRIDGEPORT REPORT     


     BRIDGEPORT --- City officials have given the green light for the development of a high density housing complex at the site of the former Testo’s restaurant on Madison Avenue and a former North End political leader is furious that there was no public hearing on the matter.

 Zoning officials gave an administrative approval to the project which will entail the construction of 177 residential units at the corner of Madison and Westfield Avenue in the heart of the North End, an area which is dominated by single-family homes. Under the new master plan and zoning regulations a public hearing was not required, officials said.

  And that’s what has Chris Caruso, a former state representative and city council member, up in arms.

  “When you think about it, to put a 177-unit complex with underground parking and the public hasn’t been able to speak on traffic, noise, density or any of those issues, it’s wrong. I believe in a public hearing. If the people are for it, by all means come out and speak in favor of it or if you’re against it come out and speak against.  But to take away that constitutional right of a public hearing to me is just an abomination,” Caruso said.


City officials have approved the construction of 177 housing units at the site of the former Testo's Restaurant, 1775 Madison Avenue. (Reginald Johnson photo)

    Caruso said he planned to speak at the public forum prior to Monday’s City Council meeting and ask that the council demand that the planning and zoning commission place a moratorium on the new master plan and regulations until there’s been a closer review of their impact. Caruso said that he would pressure Mayor Joseph P. Ganim to call for a moratorium as well.

  Additionally, the former legislator said he would call on the mayor to ask the city attorney “to investigate a statute or local law to see if we can change this development in the sense of holding a public hearing. I think the absence of a public hearing is unconscionable.”

 Testo's Ristorante, a landmark in the North End, was closed at the end of last year. The long-time owner and proprietor was Mario Testa, who ran the Democratic Town Committe for years and is a close ally of Ganim. The restaurant, which also had a catering hall, hosted many town committee meetings and election parties.

 Paul Boucher, the city zoning director, did not return a call for comment. The two city council members who represent the 133rd council district, which includes 1775 Madison Avenue --- Jeanette Herron and Aikeem Boyd --- also could not be reached.

 Caruso said he will not let up in his fight.

 "I'm going to pursue this. If they don't want us to have a public hearing, there will be a hearing in Bridgeport, because I will organize one and bring everyone out. This is something that needs to be fought," he said.

 

Wednesday, April 26, 2023

US closer to full-out war with Russia



By Reginald Johnson 


 

  Are we moving closer to a hot war with Russia?

  It certainly looks that way.

   Contradicting previous statements by the Biden administration, new information shows the US now has a small number of combat troops on the ground in Ukraine, and some are reportedly deployed with Ukrainian forces fighting Russia in the eastern part of the country.

 The recent leak of classified Pentagon documents by Air National Guardsman Jack Teixiera disclosed that 14 US Special Forces troops are in Ukraine, along with more than 80 special forces troops from other NATO countries, including the UK and France, according to a report in the BBC.

  Information in the leaked documents didn’t say where the troops are deployed or how they’re being used, according to the story. Pentagon spokesman  Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder confirmed last November that the US had a small contingent of military personnel in Ukraine connected with the US embassy, but they were there only to inspect deliveries of weapons to Ukraine and would not be involved in combat. 

 However, Special Forces are elite fighting units in the Army and are not generally connected with embassies or used for inspections.

  Also, Democratic Party presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr said on the Tucker Carlson show last week on FOX that his son had been deployed to Ukraine as a Special Forces “machine gunner” and fought alongside Ukrainian forces against the Russian army during “the Kharkiv campaign.”

 The leaked documents also showed the administration has been lying about progress by Ukraine in the war, with statements by officials like Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austen that Ukraine was doing well, with Russian military strength “waning.”.


For the past year, US officials have painted a rosy picture of how well Ukrainian forces are doing in the war with Russia. But the recent leak of Pentagon documents tells a different story.


   To the contrary, the documents reveal that Ukraine is suffering a high casualty rate, with seven Ukrainians dying for every one Russian. Also the information shows that Ukraine’s air defense system is nearly destroyed.

  In the wake of the new information, some Republicans in Congress are pressing the administration to make clear exactly what US forces are doing in Ukraine.

  “We’ve been engaged over there for a year and we’ve been hearing ‘transparency’ and ‘we will not let troops on the ground.’  Sadly, we now get information like this,” said Sen. Mike Braun of Indiana on the Tucker Carlson show on FOX April 20th.

  “A few days ago we filed a letter (to the administration), tell us, who authorized this, how many are actually there, and what are they doing?” said Braun.

  It could not be learned how many other members of Congress had signed onto the letter and who they were.

  Braun commented to Carlson that “This is eerily familiar to what we should have learned decades ago in Vietnam. Mission creep comes into play. Afghanistan, Iraq --- it looks like it’s reeling all over again. The big difference is, this is where two world wars started.  Much different setting, much different context. We’re going to be sure to get to the bottom of this.”

 On his April 13th show, Carlson said the leaked information “in fact shows that this is not Ukraine’s war. It is our war. The US is a direct combatant in the new war against Russia. As we speak American soldiers are fighting Russian soldiers. So this is not a regional conflict in Eastern Europe. This is a hot war between the two primary nuclear superpowers on earth. And yet this war has never been formally declared – it has not been authorized by Congress.

 “That means this war is a violation of American law. It is a crime,” he said.

Carlson and another guest on his show, investigative writer Glenn Greenwald decried the media’s performance in covering the Pentagon leak. Both charged that the press showed more interest in helping the government catch the person responsible for the leak and punish him, rather than reporting on the contents of the leak and their significance.

 Teixeira should be “celebrated” for the public service he performed, rather than demonized, Greenwald said.

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

Tucker Carlson, Ukraine War critic, pushed out


   By Reginald Johnson


    Commentary

 

   For those who care about the danger of US militarism, ending the proxy war in Ukraine, protecting free speech and forcing accountability from the nation's intelligence agencies, the departure of Tucker Carlson from FOX News is a big loss.

Carlson had in-depth shows on all those topics, unlike other commentators at FOX and news outlets like MSNBC and CNN.

I agree with Glenn Greenwald who wrote on Twitter:

 "Tucker was the cable host who most: * Opposed US proxy war in Ukraine; * Denounced CIA, FBI and DHS for its systemic lies and corruption; * Devoted himself to a pardon for Julian Assange; * Objected to regime change efforts in Cuba; * Criticized Trump Admin's militarism."

 Who's going to speak out on these issues now in the mainstream media? I don't know of anyone.

 Carlson would regularly bring in thoughtful, independent-minded and often progressive guests to talk about civil liberties and foreign policy issues --- including Jill Stein, Medea Benjamin, Aaron Mate, Dan Kovalik, Tulsi Gabbard, the late Stephen Cohen, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr and Greenwald.

 I particularly appreciated Carlson's outfront coverage on the Ukraine War. Right from the beginning, really months before the Russian invasion and the full-scale conflict began, Carlson was raising questions about America's role in Ukraine. He became a harsh critic of US involvement, and this showed a lot of guts, seeing as no other media voices, including those at FOX, were raising questions. 

 Carlson was a Republican so I didn't agree with him on several domestic issues. He can be faulted for a number of things, but that shouldn't wipe out his good work on a range of important topics.

 


Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Native America's rich history

 

 

    By Reginald Johnson

 

  Lucianne Lavin, the author of  “Connecticut’s Indigenous Peoples,” was reading the paper one day when she was taken aback.

  A story covered a lecture she gave on her book and Connecticut Indians and one reader had left the following comment: “Why would anyone want to read a book on Native Americans?  They’ve contributed nothing to our society.”

Lavin said, “I was enraged about this. I really wanted to write something, but I didn’t. I went to bed and thought about it.”

 “I decided to come up with a list of all the things that Native Americans have contributed to the building of America.”

 It was substantial.

 “First of all, 90 percent of our food culture, was actually contributed by Native people,” she said. The list includes corn, which came from the teosinte plant is northern Mexico and was cultivated by Indians more than 8,000 years ago, but also beans and squash.

  “And tomatoes, tomatoes are actually Native American coming out of South America, well before the Italians got it,” Lavin said. Also developed first by Indians were potatoes, which also originated in South America and the Southwest US and then brought to Europe by the Spanish.

 “And chocolate,” Lavin said, “all kinds of things you wouldn’t think were Native American, were Native American”

 Indians also provided the basis for America’s transportation system, said Lavin, who has taught archaeology and anthropology at Connecticut College and other universities.

 “Our American highways system is based on Native American pathways that crisscross the continent,” Lavin said.

 Good examples of that are some of the first “federal roads,” like Routes 1 and 7.

 “Route 7 was part of the old Berkshire path that originally started in the coastal area of Stratford and went up through Western Connecticut going through Schaghticoke and up into Massachusetts, connecting coastal Connecticut communities with major Indian communities and Western Massachusetts," she said. “For example Stockbridge, which was a major Indian town --- it was actually called Indiantown before it was called Stockbridge.”

 Indian pathways were also the basis for much of the United States railroad network.

 Native Americans also had a major impact on the development of American democracy, with the Founders like Thomas Jefferson taking political ideas from Indian tribes.

 “Jefferson and (Benjamin) Franklin actually visited the Iroquois to learn more about their Confederation, which was a democracy. In fact, all of the Native political systems in North America were democracies. They ruled by consensus. Everybody had to agree. That’s why it took so long for Native people to make decisions,” Dr. Lavin said.

  “Our Bill of Rights as well as the Constitution was based on Native American democracies,” she said.

  Other areas where Indians have had a major impact are music, art, sports and medicine.

 “A lot of our herbal doctors are utilizing Native plants and using Native prescriptions on how to use them,” she said.

Finally, Lavin noted Indians have participated in large numbers in the nation’s military. She said that as a percentage of their population Native Americans have the highest participation rate in US military of any ethnic group.

 So the contributions by Native Americans to America have been many and varied.

“What it also shows is not only that Native American communities contributed to the building of America, but that Native history is very much intertwined with American history,” Lavin said.  “I mean Native histories are part of American history --- you can’t separate them. Before the Europeans came, American history was Native history because there were no Europeans here.”

 Dr. Lavin, the director of research and collections emeritus at the Institute for American Indian Studies in Washington, CT, made her comments in a presentation at the Bridgeport Public Library in November and then in a later interview. The talk in Bridgeport coincided with Native American Heritage Month and was entitled “Connecticut’s Indigenous Communities: An Introduction to their Histories and Cultures.”

 Lavin related that indigenous people have been on the North American continent a very long time, predating the arrival of Columbus and other Europeans in the 15th and 16th centuries by thousands of years.

 Archaeological discoveries show signs of human habitation in the southwestern United States going back 36,000 years.

In Connecticut, an archaeological discovery in Avon revealed the presence of a habitation site 12,000 years old.


          

The Pequonnock River Valley in Trumbull. Archaeologists found evidence in the valley of human habitation dating to 7,000 years ago. (Photo by Reginald Johnson)

 While Europeans arrived thinking that they were going to “tame a wild wilderness” only inhabited by “savages,” quite the opposite was true.

  Indigenous people lived in well-organized societies, with a “complicated and sophisticated culture,” Lavin said. People had adequate food and shelter and  health problems were minimal. Tribes were run democratically, and everyone, including women, had a voice in the conduct of tribal affairs.

  “Native women had it so much better than English women,” Lavin noted. “Native women could vote and they could hold office. A number of sachems (chiefs) were squaw sachems in certain Native communities.”

 Indians lived harmoniously with the environment, practicing “land stewardship” ----- long before present-day environmental agencies did.

  “A lot of this had a basis where obviously they knew that if they didn’t practice stewardship, there wouldn’t be any food, and people would die,” she said, adding, “ but there was also spiritual basis behind his stewardship. ‘The Creator’ gave the tribe their homeland and therefore it was their duty to oversee and protect everything on those homelands.”

Lavin estimated that indigenous people in Connecticut lived in a “Golden Age” of culture somewhere between 1000 and 1600.

 But the arrival of Europeans brought disaster for the Native community in New England.

 European traders, as well as the earliest English and Dutch settlers, brought with them diseases that had already hit Europe, such as the plague and smallpox. Indians had not been exposed to these diseases and had no immunity.

   Disease swept through Native communities in the early 17th century, decimating their population. In some cases, tribes became extinct.

“They say anywhere from 70% to 90% of the Native Americans in New England were killed off by 1650,” Lavin said.

 Travelers found that “when they came upon an Indian town, everyone was ill. So many people were ill, they couldn’t help anybody and they just died. It was devastating.”

 Lavin went on, “This is the problem. After the Pequot War in 1637 the English began settling along the coast and the Indians couldn’t stop them because they were a crippled society. You know it’s not just the population, but it’s the leaders in those populations that are killed off.”

 “Think if Covid had killed 77% or 90% of our population?” Lavin asked. “During the pandemic, I think that people who died from Covid, the CDC came out with figures, it’s one third of 1% of our population died from Covid. Think if you had 77% of them dying?”

 Natives also began losing their land, as settlers made continual encroachments to expand farms and steal wood. In many cases Indian land was illegally sold off to other whites.

 Natives also lost land due to cultural differences. Indians had no concept of the word “selling” as it was done in Europe. In Native culture if one person from one tribe approached another Indian in another tribe and asked to use their land the first person would give it to them as a gift or as a temporary loan. The person using the land would later give it back.

 So when Indians were first approached by white settlers about selling their land they thought they were simply giving up their land temporarily. But that was not the case.

  Natives also suffered a disadvantage since they didn’t know English and didn’t know how to read contracts. Sale documents were in English and they were meaningless to them.

 In many cases Natives had their land taken through outright fraud and when they complained to local or state authorities the complaints went unanswered.

  Another factor that hurt Natives economically was the fur trade that developed after the Europeans arrived. While Natives acquired other valuables in return for the trade the number of animals that they needed for food drastically diminished.

  “The whites totally destroyed the Native American economy,” said Lavin. “By 1800, you know, the largest animal in Connecticut were woodchucks.”

  By the 19th century, indigenous people in Connecticut were vastly reduced in number, poor and suffered discrimination at all levels.


     

Native dancers. (Photo Wikimedia Commons)

  According to Lavin, Native leaders realized they had to begin adapting to the new world thrust upon them in order for their people to live.

  They came up with strategies to survive.  First, learn English. They began doing that, in part by joining Christian churches, where missionaries were teaching the Bible in English and helped Natives learn the language.

  Being a Christian also give the Indians some protection from discrimination, Natives believed.

 Another path followed was to join the Anglo-American market economy, Lavin said. Indians took jobs as laborers, farm hands, colliers (charcoal makers), silversmiths, basket weavers, dockworkers and sailors.

Another means of assimilating into society was to join the military. And Natives did that in large numbers, as noted above.

 Today, the number of tribes in Connecticut, officially recognized by the state, is 6. They are the Mohegans, Mashuntucket Pequots and Eastern Pequots in the southeast, the Golden Hill Paugussetts in the southwest and west; and the Schaghticokes (now in two branches) in the northwest.

  But Lavin says there are many more Natives living in Connecticut who are from other tribes, inexplicably not recognized by the state. Among those tribes are the Quinnipiacs in the New Haven-Branford area; the Nipmucks in the east and the Niantics in the southeast.

  In spite of ignorance by many non-Natives about Native-Americans and their history and contributions, as well as ongoing discrimination, inconsistent help from the government and in some cases poverty, indigenous people carry on, maintaining their culture and upholding their traditions.

  In the chapter entitled “A.D. 1633 into the Twenty-First Century” in her book, Dr. Lavin said: “Despite the efforts of archaeologists and social historians, the public tends to believe in inaccurate portrayals of Native histories. Few people have any conception of the continuity of local Native communities, Native preservation of cultural traditions and group identities and the longtime resistance of Native people to the intensive continuous discrimination and detribalization efforts of local and federal governments and non-Native individuals. This book aims to change all that. As Cree-Salish-Kootenai author D'Arcy McNickle wrote: “Only the Indians seemed unwilling to accept oblivion as an appropriate final act in the New World drama… They lost, but were never defeated.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, March 10, 2023

Activists to protest visit by Israeli leader

 By Reginald Johnson


  

  The organization Jewish Voice for Peace will sponsor demonstrations in Connecticut this Sunday and Wednesday to protest the visit to Washington by Israel’s Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich.

 Shelly Altman of the New Haven chapter of JVP said the actions will take place Sunday at 10 am (DST) at the Federal Building, 150 Church Street, New Haven and Wednesday at 4 pm at the Connecticut State Treasurer’s office, 165 Capitol Avenue, Hartford.

   Jewish Voice for Peace opposes Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and supports the “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” movement against Israel due to repressive policies against the Palestinians.

 Henry Lowendorf, of the Greater New Haven Peace Council is urging people to take part in the protests.

   “The Apartheid state is becoming more and more open about its repression --- displacement, exile, ethnic cleansing, murder, theft --- of Palestinians with Pogroms by fanatic Jewish settlers that mimic those many of our Jewish ancestors fled a century ago,” said Lowendorf. “Dare we also imagine KrystalNacht?”

  “Only because the US subsidizes Israel financially, politically and militarily can it continue to exist and metasiasize as an Apartheid state,” he said. “So we must take a stand. Now is the time.”