By Reginald Johnson
BRIDGEPORT
---- I’m sorry. This is hard to comprehend.
Joe Ganim, he of 16
felony convictions for corruption during his time as mayor in the 1990s and an
alumni of federal prison, has won the support of a majority of Democrats voting
in a primary to be their standard bearer in the general election for mayor in
November.
Huh? Is this incredible or what?
Ever since Wednesday
night when it was becoming apparent that Ganim was going to beat out incumbent Mayor
Bill Finch and businesswoman Mary-Jane Foster for the Democratic Party
nomination, I’ve been trying to figure this out. It hasn’t been easy.
I saw the vote
totals come up on the board on Channel 12 and I saw Ganim ahead with well over
5,000 votes. Finch also had over 5,000, but was behind by about 200-300. Then I
saw the joyous people at the Ganim election party --- at Testo’s Restaurant of
course --- people smiling, laughing and hugging Joe Gamin. Ganim had just
declared victory.
I thought, are these people delusional? What
are they thinking?
What is it about Joe
Ganim or what did he do or say in his campaign that is so compelling that
people would just wipe away his outrageous record as mayor --- being involved
in one of the worst municipal corruption scandals in New England history --- and
decide to back him?
I went over in my mind the various possible
reasons. Angst over high taxes. Yes, that’s a reason to be upset with the
incumbent, though taxes weren’t exactly low during the Ganim years. Another is Finch’s
personality. Finch can be spiteful and
sometimes arrogant, which showed during the Board of Education takeover plan.
His persona turned a number of people off.
And then there’s the
police union. Police were upset over contract cuts and staffing shortages in
the Finch years. OK, those are reasonable complaints, too. That’s a lot of
votes there, between union members and their spouses, brothers and sisters.
But here’s the $64
question. Why, if you’re upset with Finch for those reasons, would you make the
leap and go for someone so tarnished by corruption as Ganim, when there’s a
viable alternative in the race, in Mary-Jane Foster?
Foster was a good
candidate, no political baggage, and a proven executive and business person.
Why would so many
people just pass her over, and opt for Ganim?
I don’t know for
sure, but I think there probably two key factors. First is, a lot of the people going for Ganim
were angry over having lost something during the Finch years, something they
had in the Ganim years. A job, a position, a title, a program that was lost. A
good number of people are in this category and some of them had legitimate
beefs. It looks as if these folks were willing to set aside the memory of
Ganim’s corruption, because Joe was the guy that was going to make things
right, because he did it before, not Foster. This was the guy that was going to
float their ship.
The other thing at work, I believe, was that Ganim pandered successfully to the black community,
making lots of promises and glossing over his record. He got a lot of votes from the African-American community. He demagogically played
on the public safety issue, blaming Finch for crime in black neighborhoods,
when actually crime rates in the city are down. Ganim of course conveniently
didn’t tell people that violent crime rates were much worse during his years as
mayor. (Remember the “Phoenix
Barriers”?)
He also wasn’t about
to tell people that his record on affordable housing --- another issue very important to many blacks
--- was terrible. In the Ganim years, hundreds of units of housing were torn
down, with minimal replacement.
Many blacks were
apparently sympathetic to Ganim’s plea for redemption. ‘I did wrong, I served
my time, now I want a second chance.’ I think blacks related to that because possibly
they knew someone who went to jail, and then came out, and needed a second
chance to right themselves. During interviews I did around the city, I heard
“he deserves a second chance” several times from black residents.
There may be other
reasons that factored in the primary result, some possibly that could come out
from investigations. We’ll just have to see.
In meantime, it’s
shaping up for the general election as Joe Ganim, Democrat, versus Rick Torres,
Republican, and Bill Finch, who said he will stick it out and run on a third party ticket, and
possibly Foster and others on independent tickets as well.
Ganim, now the
Democratic nominee, has to be favored in this city which usually elects the
Democratic Party nominee for mayor.
Whatever Finch’s
flaws, I think the city was basically headed in the right direction the last
few years. What happened yesterday was a step backwards.
MEDIA NOTES
MEDIA NOTES
A few thoughts on
media coverage of the primary race. Basically, it wasn’t very good.
The Connecticut Post, the main vehicle for coverage, did a
fairly good job with breaking news on the campaign. Brian Lockhart is a good
reporter, though he tends to over featurize his stories. Everything reads like
a column. But overall, not a bad job on regular campaign news.
My chief complaint
is where the paper placed stories related to the campaign and Finch’s
administration, and not doing some larger stories on the race. I
don’t know whether the paper was bending over backwards to look impartial, or
whether they were just teed off at Finch over transparency issues, but they
wound up underplaying some news stories that happened to make Finch look good.
Recently, the Hampton Inn chain announced they were going to
build a Hampton Inn at Steel Point. This is a major development. A top hotel
coming to town --- the first in about 30 years --- well, that’s a big story. It
deserves Page 1. But instead it was placed inside the paper. Why?
Downtown developer Phil Kuchma also had a major announcement
recently that he was beginning a Phase II in his downtown development. That’s
also big. But the Post ran it inside.
I didn’t get every
single paper over the last six months, so maybe I missed this. But there should
have been a large, blow-out piece on Joe Ganim. He was mayor for 12 years, and
so much happened in this period. The Post should have detailed what he did,
both legally and illegally, both the good and the bad. The controversial zoning
cases, the demolitions, the fight over the Juvenile
Detention Center,
the construction of the Bluefish stadium and the Arena, the secrecy of his administration, and finally the
corruption cases themselves.
People who weren’t
around needed to be informed, and others needed to be reminded.
But as far as I know, no such a piece ever appeared.
Also, the Post
created the feeling in this race that the real battle was just between Finch and
Ganim. Foster got second fiddle. There should have been more equal coverage all
the way around.
Finally, the Post
should have dug into some of the claims of irregularities going on during the
campaign --- issues about questionable petition signatures, absentee ballots,
and so on. The Post, owned by the huge Hearst Newspapers Corporation, could have put
the resources into play to do this, but they didn’t. Instead, they left it to state investigators to probe the complaints, and there will be no results
for months. When results are announced, the election will have come and gone,
and the issue will be a moot point for most voters.
That's too bad, because voters should get critical information about verified wrongdoing before an election, not after.
That's too bad, because voters should get critical information about verified wrongdoing before an election, not after.