Tuesday, December 10, 2024

To avert nuclear war, stop sending missiles to Ukraine!


  By Reginald Johnson


                                     Commentary

  URGENT: The situation in Ukraine is quite serious. We all need to take notice and if possible, to take action.

 In recent weeks the war between Ukraine and Russia entered a new and highly-dangerous phase after Ukraine fired US-made ATACMS missiles into Russia and were given assistance in the launch by American personnel.  This attack was made after President Biden, reversing a previous position, gave the greenlight. Russia responded by firing back with a new and more deadly missile at Ukraine.

 At the same time, Russia changed its nuclear doctrine, lowering the threshold under which they would make a nuclear response to a missile attack. According to experts like Scott Ritter, a former UN weapons inspector and intelligence official, the ATACMS missiles used by Ukraine MEET THE STANDARD FOR A NUCLEAR RESPONSE under Russia’s new doctrine. This is frightening. Should Ukraine fire these missiles again at Russia, who knows what will happen?

 Many people think that Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, would never go so far as to retaliate with a nuclear weapon. But who can be sure? The fact is, according to Ritter and others, we are closer to a nuclear conflict then we have ever been and that includes the very dangerous Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. We really need to let our voices be heard and say that as clearly as possible we don’t want nuclear war, which would result in the end of life on earth.

  Ritter and others like peace activist Medea Benjamin of Code Pink are making a good suggestion --- that we call our elected representatives in Congress and demand that they pressure President Biden to reverse his decision on allowing the use of ATACMS missiles. At the same time, they ask that we tell our Congress Member to support House Bill 10218, which prohibits the administration from shipping any more ATACMS to Ukraine.

  We need to flood Congress with calls. It can make a difference. The Congressional switchboard is 202-224-3121. Call that number and ask for your congress person and they will switch you in. You can connect with your senators through the same number. While you’re at it, call the White House at 202-456-1111 and say you don’t want nuclear war and the President needs to pursue peace and stop sending missiles.

 Thank you!

 

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

US preparing for nuclear war, expert warns

 

     

     By Reginald Johnson

   

    

    As the war between Russia and Ukraine grows more intense, a former UN weapons inspector and intelligence analyst is warning that military officials in the United States are now actively preparing for a nuclear war with Russia.

 Scott Ritter, a former Iraq weapons inspector and intelligence official with the US Marines, claimed that as one option the United States is considering actually starting a nuclear war with Russia by firing a preemptive strike to knock out all of Russia’s nuclear weaponry and emerge victorious, despite maintaining massive human losses.

 “It is high time for everyone from every walk of life to understand the path we are currently on,” said Ritter. “Left unchecked, events are propelling us down a highway to hell that leads to only one destination – a nuclear Armageddon that everyone agrees can’t be won, and yet the United States is at this very moment preparing to ‘win.’ “

 Ritter added, “a nuclear exchange with Russia, even if the United States were able to execute a surprise preemptive nuclear strike, would result in the destruction of dozens of American cities and more than 100 million Americans.

  “And this is if we ‘win,’ ” he said. “And we know that we can’t ‘win’ a nuclear war. And yet we are actively preparing to fight one,” he said.

  Ritter added, “This insanity must stop. Now.”

 Ritter made his comments in his Substack column “On the Brink” posted November 24.

   The former weapons inspector spoke out as the Ukraine war has taken a dangerous turn after President Biden gave approval to Ukraine to fire US-made long-range ballistic missiles at Russia. The green light reversed a previous decision by Biden in September not to allow Ukraine to use the missiles, out of concern that such attacks would lead to a confrontation with Russia, which has the largest nuclear stockpile in the world.

  With the approval granted, Ukraine on November 19 fired six US “ATACMS”  missiles at Russia, near the city of Bryansk. On November 20, Ukraine launched up to a dozen British-made Storm Shadow cruise missiles against a Russian command post in the Kursk province. Russia responded on November 21, firing a new intermediate range missile called the “Oreshnik” against Ukraine, destroying a major arms factory in Dnipropetrovsk. The facility was used by Ukraine and NATO to produce short and intermediate range missiles.


Ukraine has been fighting Russia almost three years. Now there are worries the conflict could go nuclear. (Wikimedia photo)



 Meanwhile, Russian leader Vladimir Putin announced that his country has changed its nuclear use doctrine, lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons.

  The ATACMS and Storm Shadow missile attacks met the threshold for a nuclear response by Russia, Ritter said.

 “Russia has decided not to invoke its nuclear doctrine at this juncture,” said Ritter, “opting instead to eject the operational use of the Oreshnik missile as an intermediate non-nuclear deterrence measure.”

  But the question is, how long will the Russians hold off on going nuclear – if Ukrainian attacks continue?

 It’s clear the risk of a nuclear war starting is the greatest since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, when the United States and Russia came extremely close to going to war over the placement of Russian missiles on Cuban soil.

 Ritter is a widely respected analyst and commentator on foreign-policy and military issues. He gained fame in 2003 when he called out the Bush administration’s bogus claims that Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction. The administration used the WMD claim to launch an invasion of Iraq, triggering a seven-years-long war, which took 1 million lives.

  Investigations after the war began confirmed what Ritter had said – there were no WMD.

 Despite the severity of the crisis in Eastern Europe – with the possibility that a nuclear war could take place – American media, including progressive media, don’t appear to be overly concerned. Most of the press attention in recent weeks has been focused on the wars in Gaza and Lebanon or Donald Trump’s cabinet picks and most recently the decision by President Biden to pardon his son Hunter. There have been few segments on TV concerning the Ukraine War and the imminent danger of a nuclear confrontation between the US and Russia.

  A few commentators in the conservative media have been sounding the alarm about a possible nuclear war. One of them is Rob Finnerty of Newsmax, who has spent several recent shows talking about the dangerous situation in Ukraine.

  “Russia has more nuclear weapons than any other country on the planet and now Ukraine is firing missiles deep into Russia, and those missiles were made in the United States,” he said.

 “Those are just the facts.  The United States is no longer in a proxy war with Russia. We are at war with Russia,” he said.

  Finnerty criticized Biden for green-lighting the Ukrainian missile attacks, which he said undermine President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for ending the Ukraine war. Trump takes office on January 20.

 “We are a lot closer to World War III then we were yesterday,” Finnerty said.

 

   (A panel discussion about the danger of a nuclear war starting in Ukraine will take place this Saturday in Washington, D.C. The event, called “No Nuclear War --- A Call to Reason” will take place at the National Press Club and run from 4 to 7 pm.  Moderated by Ritter, panel participants include Lawrence Wilkerson, Max Blumenthal, Garland Nixon, Dan Kovalik and Margaret Kimberley.  To reserve a seat, go to www.nonuclearwar.com)

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Consortium News, frequent critic of the government, defeats a hacking attack

   By Reginald Johnson  


   Great news that Consortium News is back up and running after a hacking attack that made it disappear from the web for a number of days. They haven't identified a culprit yet, but the guilty party I suspect is somebody or group in our government or internationally that didn't like CN's truth-telling about the genocide in Gaza, the Ukraine War, Julian Assange, the intelligence community and other sensitive subjects.

Consortium News has recently been suing the government and its hokey censorship operation, "News Guard," for defammation.

Note this attack on a news operation happened during the administration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who have bragged during the presidential campaign that they represent some kind of bulwark against fascism possibly being ushered in by Donald Trump. Really. In fact, stifling of news is a hallmark of police states. And it's going on now.

This is George Orwell's "1984" coming true.

The statement from CN today says: "Our victory was just one battle in an escalating war against a free press, however, which has included recent arrests, interrogations and home raids against journalists both in Britain and the U.S."
Winning a Battle Over Control of Our Site

Saturday, September 21, 2024

Almost the unthinkable

  

    By Reginald Johnson


   A nuclear catastrophe was narrowly avoided in the Ukraine-Russia War last weekend.

  According to former intelligence officer and arms control expert Scott Ritter. Ukraine had been pressing Washington for permission to use long-range ballistic missiles to hit targets deep within Russia and it appeared that the US was about to greenlight this request. But President Biden backed off at the last minute after a stern warning from Russian President Vladimir Putin that the use of the missiles would be crossing the Rubicon.

 Putin had said that such strikes would be regarded as an attack by NATO against Russia and all bets would be off in terms of how Russia would respond. Ritter says that Ukraine, led by crazed leader Volodomyr Zelensky, was all set to use the missiles. Thank god Biden saw the light.  Otherwise, according to Ritter, none of us would be reading these words today. 

It is vital that negotiations bring this highly volatile conflict between Ukraine and Russia to an end as soon as possible, for the sake of humanity.

(Ritter's piece, "72 Hours" can be read at https://consortiumnews.com/category/u-n-security-council/)




Monday, September 9, 2024

Israel bombs Gaza during polio vaccination drive

                                            Commentary


 By Reginald Johnson


 How low can Israel go? And how low can the United States go in supporting Israel?

 In the latest atrocity brought on the Palestinians, the Israeli military has bombed Gaza while humanitarian pauses are in effect so children can be given polio shots. A hospital has been hit and a school has been bombed.

 The vaccination drive by the UN is in question now after the IDF detained UN staff at gunpoint and bulldozed UN vehicles.

  These actions that impede a life-saving vaccination drive for children are not just shameful, they are barbaric. And the United States is aiding and abetting the barbarism.

Read it and weep.

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/israel-strikes-gaza-amid-polio-vaccination-drive


Tuesday, August 27, 2024

'Our news desert is getting bigger and drier'

 

 

        By Reginald Johnson 


   As many of you have heard, the fine all-news station WCBS Radio 880 in New York has been shut down to make way for sports talk, which is a disgrace.

   In the final sign-off for the station on Sunday night, anchor Wayne Cabot talked eloquently about the decline of news in our society and “the fight to stay informed.”

 Here is his statement:

“All of us here knew our audience is engaged and smart and we treated our audience with the respect that a well-informed, well-educated news consumer deserves. That’s right, deserves. Our news desert is getting bigger and drier. It’s like we should get a second medical opinion. 

  "We need to seek out more, and more varied news sources that we trust, because getting your information without the lies and brainwashing in one place has given way to a fight to stay informed. With each closing newspaper, radio newsroom, TV newsrooms, magazines and now even digital news operations, the country we love is diminished.

“So as we leave the news ecosystem after 57 years and 100 years of service on New York radio, we implore you to find that next trusted source , use it, support it in word and in deed. It’s the most patriotic thing you can do and the most satisfying. To paraphrase a CBS News legend (Edward R. Murrow),  “Good night, and good luck.”

  

Friday, August 23, 2024

Pillar of news coverage replaced by sports talk

 

   By Reginald Johnson

    

These are the last days for a bastion of news coverage, WCBS News Radio 880 in New York.

The station, which presented local, regional and national news pretty much 24-7 for the past 57 years to millions of people in the New York tri-state area, will close down news operations on Monday. A new station called WHSQ will take over and present ESPN sports talk.

  What a disaster. WCBS did quite a good job over the years reporting news in a thorough and professional manner. You had local and regional reports throughout the day and national and world stories at the top of the hour. And every half hour, you got sports headlines, traffic and weather.

 You could always turn on 880 and be sure you were going to get a pretty good overview of what was going on. It was kind of like “Old Reliable” on the radio dial.

 Now there’s going to be a “news desert” in what is supposed to be the “communications capital of the world” --- New York City.

  The parent company of WCBS, something called “Audacy” (they should just call it “Audacity”) insists that all is not lost. They say a sister station, 1010 WINS, still offers 24-7 news and will fill the void.

  No, it won’t. I’ve listened to 1010 WINS and it’s pathetic. Here’s the typical fare on WINS: somebody got assaulted in Times Square, a person was shot in the Bronx, or a car jumped the curb and hit a store window in Queens. Few national stories or any stories of import are offered.

  People will say, no problem, just bring up the Internet on your cell phone and you’ll get all the big news you need. Yes, you can, but in most cases you’ll have to pay for it. For most sites, like newspaper sites, you have to be a subscriber.

 And that’s another nice thing about WCBS 880. It’s free. Just turn on the radio, hit a button, and you’re there. You had news for free and totally accessible. No pay walls.

 Yes, you had to put up with ads, but so what? You got a lot of news.

 Personally, I go way back with WCBS 880. I've been listening for over 50 years. I can remember listening to the Senate Watergate hearings in 1973, and John Dean giving testimony, as I drove to work at the Bridgeport Telegram where I was a cub reporter. The station was running the Watergate hearings live, which was a real public service.

 And that's another key point that has to be made here. WCBS 880 provided a public service.  This is what journalism is supposed to do. The station is really a public service institution. Now some corporation, looking solely at its bottom line, and not considering the public interest, can just flick it away. Gone. This should not be allowed to happen.

But it does happen in our capitalist system where public needs or community needs are just not part of the equation.

Yesterday I heard longtime anchors Wayne Cabot and Paul Murnane chatting and reminiscing. Both have been there for 30-40 years covering so many big events, including 911.  Former legendary reporter Rich Lamb (who I remember came up to Bridgeport in 1987 to cover the L’Ambiance construction disaster) called in and said the end of WCBS represented a “radio earthquake” for the New York area and leaves a "vacumn." He’s right. Former anchor Bridgette Quinn and a producer (whose name I can't remember) also mourned the loss of the station. The producer said the time she spent at the station were “the best years of her life.” It was sad.

 Below is a good piece from CNN about the closure of 880, the decline of all-news radio, and the financial pressures stations are facing. https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/16/media/news-radio-local-wcbs-wnyc-sign-off-job-cuts-spotify/index.html

So there you have it.

All-news radio replaced by 24-7 sports talk.

Welcome to the dumbing down of America.